Quantcast
Channel: Cathode Ray Tube
Viewing all 117 articles
Browse latest View live

10TH ANNIVERSARY COMPETITION: Win Doctor Who: City of Death and Myths & Legends books!

$
0
0
Continuing our 10th Anniversary celebrations, we've got more Doctor Who books to giveaway. This week we have a paperback edition of James Goss' novelisation of Douglas Adams' celebrated story City of Death. Bundled with this is a hardback copy ofMyths & Legends: Epic Tales from Alien Worlds by Richard Dinnick.


Based on the beloved Doctor Who episode of the same name by Douglas Adams, the hilarious and brilliant author of The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, comes City of Death

The Doctor takes Romana on holiday in Paris—a city which, like a fine wine, has a bouquet all of its own. Especially if you visit during one of the vintage years. But the TARDIS takes them to 1979, a year whose vintage is soured by cracks in the fabric of time.

Soon they are embroiled in an alien scheme which encompasses home-made time machines, the theft of the Mona Lisa, the resurrection of the much-feared Jagaroth race, and the beginning (and possibly the end) of all life on Earth. It’s up to the Doctor and Romana to thwart the machinations of the suave, mysterious Count Scarlioni—all twelve of him—if the human race has any chance of survival.

But then, the Doctor’s holidays tend to turn out a bit like this.

Written by Richard Dinnick and brilliantly illustrated by Adrian Salmon, Doctor Who - Myths and Legends takes traditional legends and gives them a Time Lord twist.

For thousands of years, epic stories have been passed down from Time Lord to student, generation to generation. The truth of these tales was lost millennia ago, but the myths and legends themselves are timeless.

These are the most enduring of those tales. From the princess Manussa and her giant snake Mara, to the Vardon Horse of Xeriphin, these stories shed light on the universe around us and the beings from other worlds that we meet. Myths hold up a mirror to our past, present and future, explaining our culture, our history, our hopes and fears.

A collection of epic adventures from the Time Lords’ mist-covered past, Myths and Legends is an unforgettable gallery of heroes and villains, gods and monsters.


COMPETITION

Cathode Ray Tube has one copy of each to give away to one lucky winner courtesy of BBC Books and Penguin Random House. Simply answer the question below and submit your entry via email.


  • - This competition is open to residents of the UK only but not to employees of BBC Books and Penguin Random House or their agents. 

  • - Entries must be received by midnight GMT on Friday 29th September 2017. 

  • - This offer cannot be used in conjunction with any other offer and no cash alternative is available.

  • - No responsibility will be accepted for delayed, mislaid, lost or damaged entries whether due to system error or otherwise.

  • - Only one entry per visitor per day. No multiple entries allowed. Entries sent using answers posted on competition websites will be deemed void. We know who you are!

  • - The winner will be the first entry with the correct answer drawn at random.

  • - The winner will be contacted by email and the books will be sent by first class post to the winner after the competition closes.

  • - The judges' decision is final and no correspondence will be entered into.

  • - Entrants are deemed to accept and be bound by these rules and entries that are not in accordance with the rules will be disqualified.

  • - By entering the free prize draw, entrants agree to be bound by any other requirements set out on this website. Entry is via email to frank_c_collins@hotmail.com. No responsibility can be accepted for entries not received, only partially received or delayed for whatever reason. Paper entries are not valid.
Question: In the televised City of Death which two actors make a cameo appearance as eccentric art dealers? 

Email your answer to the question above, with your name and address, including post code, and we'll enter you into the prize draw.

Good luck!

10TH ANNIVERSARY COMPETITION: Win Doctor Who - The Book of Whoniversal Records

$
0
0
It's the end, but the moment has been prepared for. Yes, it's the last of our 10th Anniversary competitions celebrating a decade of blogging and, generally, babbling to ourselves here atCathode Ray Tube.  

Those lovely people at BBC Books and Penguin Random House have provided us with a great giveaway for this week's competition in the form of Simon Guerrier's very entertaining Doctor Who: The Book of Whoiversal Records

This is a fact-packed, fully illustrated celebration of the best, biggest and most impossible moments from the world of Doctor Who.

The Doctor Who Book of Whoniversal Recordsis a celebration of the greatest – and strangest – achievements from the brilliant, impossible world of Doctor Who. Bursting with firsts and bests both human and alien – from the biggest explosion in the universe to the first human to time-travel; from the longest fall through space to the shortest life-form that ever lived – this book will answer all of your burning questions about the last of the Time Lords and his adventures through time and space. 

These are feats literally impossible to try at home – but Whoniversal Records has the photographs to prove they happened! Packed with astounding facts, figures, and fun, The Book of Whoniversal Records is the ultimate must-have for Doctor Who fans everywhere (and every-when!). 

COMPETITION
Cathode Ray Tube has one copy of Whoniversal Records to give away to one lucky winner courtesy of BBC Books and Penguin Random House. Simply answer the question below and submit your entry via email.

  • - This competition is open to residents of the UK only but not to employees of BBC Books and Penguin Random House or their agents. 

  • - Entries must be received by midnight GMT on Friday 6th October 2017.

  • - This offer cannot be used in conjunction with any other offer and no cash alternative is available.

  • - No responsibility will be accepted for delayed, mislaid, lost or damaged entries whether due to system error or otherwise.

  • - Only one entry per visitor per day. No multiple entries allowed. Entries sent using answers posted on competition websites will be deemed void. We know who you are!

  • - The winner will be the first entry with the correct answer drawn at random.

  • - The winner will be contacted by email and the books will be sent by first class post to the winner after the competition closes.

  • - The judges' decision is final and no correspondence will be entered into.

  • - Entrants are deemed to accept and be bound by these rules and entries that are not in accordance with the rules will be disqualified.

  • - By entering the free prize draw, entrants agree to be bound by any other requirements set out on this website. Entry is via email to frank_c_collins@hotmail.com. No responsibility can be accepted for entries not received, only partially received or delayed for whatever reason. Paper entries are not valid.
Question: Who provided the very first 'monster voice' in an episode of Doctor Who?

Email your answer to the question above, with your name and address, including post code, and we'll enter you into the prize draw.

Good luck!

RANDALL AND HOPKIRK (DECEASED) and MAN IN A SUITCASE / Vinyl Soundtrack Albums

$
0
0
Network Distributing debuted a pair of exclusive vinyl soundtrack album releases this week. Focusing on two iconic ITC series of the late 1960s and early 1970s, Randall and Hopkirk (Deceased) and Man in A Suitcase, these beautifully designed albums assemble a number of instantly recognisable cues on high quality 180g vinyl pressed by Pallas in Germany.

Network worked with renowned vinyl cutting engineer Ray Staff, whose credits include David Bowie's The Rise and Fall of Ziggy Stardust and The Spiders From Mars and The Rolling Stones'It's Only Rock 'n' Roll, to master the albums from the FX Group tape transfers.

Ray joined the legendary Trident Studios, based in St Anne's Court, Soho, in 1970 and he became part of the fledgling Mastering Department. His skill at working on major projects with Bowie and Elton John saw him progress to become Trident’s Chief Mastering Engineer. He is currently one of the chief engineers at AIR Mastering having worked with artists as diverse as Led Zeppelin and Supertramp and most recently on the triple platinum No 1 debut album and single by Corinne Bailey Rae.


Network commented: 'Although high-quality masters were already available from the 2008 CD releases, we have returned to the original analogue tapes which have been mastered afresh for vinyl to take advantage of the format’s more subtle dynamic range. Mastering and vinyl cutting have been supervised by one of the very best in the business, ensuring that these tracks have never sounded so good since they went down onto tape in the late 1960s.'

Created by Dennis Spooner and Monty Berman, Randall and Hopkirk (Deceased)'s 26 episodes were produced and made by Scoton Productions for worldwide distribution by ITC. Their track record stretched back to some of the classic 1960s series made under the ITC banner, including The Baron (1966-67), The Champions (1968-69) and Department S (1969-70). Filming commenced in May 1968 at ABC Elstree Borehamwood, continuing into July 1969, and the series featured the crime busting antics of down at heel private investigator Jeff Randall (Mike Pratt) and his partner Marty Hopkirk (Kenneth Cope). The major selling point was that the murdered Marty was reincarnated as a ghost in the very first episode My Late Lamented Friend and Partner, transmitted in September 1969, and then 'haunted' his partner throughout the rest of the series.

Providing the music for the series was legendary composer Edwin Astley. Ted had composed the memorable themes and cues for Danger Man (1960-68), The Saint (creating two arrangements for the black and white and colour episodes between 1962 and 1969), The Baron, Department S and The Champions. Of the distinctive harpsichord dominated theme of Randall and Hopkirk (Deceased) he commented: 'It has to be something distinctive in the orchestration or in the tune and I suppose that's why I used the harpsichord because in those days it was a very distinctive sound.'(1)

He recorded a total of 188 cues for the series and the harpsichord (often used as stings to herald the appearance and disappearance of Marty and effortlessly rearranged as his signature motif), organ, high strings and high-pitched flutes and clarinets add a melancholic counterpoint (Astley's use of the minor key underlining the series' quirky notions of the afterlife) to the dynamic music, driven by strident strings, drums, brass and bass, which scores the series' action sequences.

The album features the iconic opening and end titles, the trilling notes of the harpsichord highlighting a mid-tempo jazzy waltz, and specific cues from nine episodes. They brilliantly showcase Astley's splendid sense of melody, jazz structure (the music for Money to Burn is particularly lovely) and use of motif to enhance scenes. And on vinyl they sound more organic and subtle.

The thirty one episodes of Man In A Suitcase, created by Richard Harris and Dennis Spooner under its original title of McGill, were produced in collaboration with American producer Stanley Greenberg and prolific ITC producer Sidney Cole. Filming started at Pinewood Studios in August 1966 and the series was filmed in two blocks and completed in December 1967, by which time it had been given its more familiar title. The lead role of McGill, a disgraced CIA operative taking cases on a freelance basis around the world, was given to 28 year-old Texan method actor Richard Bradford after ITC's Lew Grade saw him in Arthur Penn's The Chase (1966).

Man In A Suitcase features the work of two composers, Ron Grainer and Albert Elms. Grainer needs little introduction. A prolific television and film composer, his signature themes for Maigret (BBC, 1959-63), Steptoe and Son (BBC, 1962-74) Doctor Who (BBC, 1963-89, 1996, 2005-), The Prisoner (1967-8) and Tales of the Unexpected (ITV, 1979-88) gained him worldwide recognition. He also branched out into films, such as To Sir, With Love (1967) and The Assassination Bureau (1969), and in 1971 produced the stunning score for The Omega Man. The Grainer theme to Man In A Suitcase would gain greater recognition in its appropriation for the Chris Evans Channel 4 show TFI Friday.

Grainer's strident piano, brass and percussion driven theme anticipates his work on The Prisoner and its boldness epitomises the values of the anti-heroic central character of McGill.  In counterpoint Albert Elms offers a range of contrasting cues for eleven episodes on this album. Again, his use of lietmotif, low key woodwind, moody brass and percussion offers a taste of what was to come with his eclectic work on The Prisoner. Here, the music switches from upbeat, 1960s pop and punchy action themes, to wistful melancholia or cute jazz with Spanish and Mexican influences (often as a musical accompaniment to that week's location in the episode).

Both albums make for very nostalgic listening, as wonderful examples of music from the golden age of television, and the album artwork is beautifully handled and presented by Martin Cater. Serious vinyl collectors will get a lot of pleasure from their analogue audio fidelity and quality.

(1) Andrew Pixley, Randall and Hopkirk - Accompanying Notes 2008 CD Release

Note: these albums are only available direct from Network's site.
Randall and Hopkirk (Deceased)
Original Soundtrack Selections
Music by Edwin Astley
Network 7859033
Mono
Released: 28 October 2013

Man In A Suitcase
Original Soundtrack Selections
Music by Albert Elms
Theme by Ron Grainer
Network 7959028
Mono
Released: 28 October 2013

Although high-quality masters were already available from the CD releases, we have returned to the original analogue tapes which have been mastered afresh for vinyl to take advantage of the format’s more subtle dynamic range. Mastering and vinyl cutting have been supervised by one of the very best in the business – Ray Staff of AIR Studios – ensuring that these tracks have never sounded so good since they went down onto tape in the late 1960s. - See more at: http://networkonair.com/features/2013/10/25/the-story-behind-our-new-vinyl-releases/#sthash.9OaYXEsC.dpu

FUTURE TENSE: British Science Fiction Television - Part One / 1938–1969: ‘Bring Something Back’  - From R.U.R to The Prisoner

$
0
0
R.U.R ©BBC 1938
Originally posted on the original Moviemail website (now sadly revamped and no longer providing the same opportunity to write such pieces), this was a series of blogs tracing the apocalyptic themes of British science fiction television. It was published between August and December 2014 to tie in with the BFI’s major retrospective and celebration of the science fiction genre Sci-Fi: Days of Fear and Wonder.

These are the longer, uncut versions of the original posts with minor additions and corrections.

The earliest examples of British science fiction television, two adaptations of Karel Čapek’s 1920 stage play R.U.R (aka Rossum’s Universal Robots), from which the word ‘robot’ entered the language, bookended the span of the Second World War. Jan Bussell’s thirty-five minute version was produced for BBC’s fledgling television service in 1938. Experimental in nature, the Radio Times advertised it as “a play that should lend itself very well indeed to television from the point of view of effects.” It was remade ten years later, again by Bussell, and featured future Doctor Who Patrick Troughton as one of the robots leading a revolution against their human creators.

R.U.R touched on major themes about dehumanisation through technology and the failures of a technologically driven utopia. It seemed entirely apt to revisit such themes in 1948 as British society emerged from the privations of the Second World War, rejected the imposed austerity of the 1950s and set about considering the future.

The play traversed the technocratic idealism and scientific romance of H. G. Wells’ The Shape of Things to Come, published in 1933, and its extension into dystopian, totalitarianism in George Orwell’s novel of 1949, Nineteen Eighty-Four. Both were part of a British science fiction literary tradition that included Arthur Conan Doyle, E.M Forster, Rudyard Kipling, John Wyndham, Aldous Huxley, Olaf Stapledon, C.S. Lewis, John Christopher and Arthur C. Clarke.

They epitomised the then key elements of the British science fiction tradition, one quite different to the pulp American form of the 1930s and 1940s. British insularity, isolation, anxiety and apocalypse were state of the nation tropes and they would be manifested in literature, theatre, cinema and, most effectively, on television.

Both versions of R.U.R were also televisual experiments that expanded upon the innovations of radio and theatre. Their creative use of limited resources established another tradition of British science fiction television where the visually and audibly strange were presented in the ordinary, intimate, domestic environment of the viewer.

The Time Machine ©BBC 1949
This was developed further with Robert Barr’s 1949 adaptation of Wells’s The Time Machine, transmitted in January of that year, which ambitiously employed back projection, live cross fading, mixing between cameras, models and telecine inserts to depict the Time Traveller’s journey through time. Barr established the medium’s future form and gradually introduced documentary techniques into drama.

In this period, several BBC plays embraced science fiction and horror concepts.These included the alternate history of Take Back Your Freedom (1948) and J.B. Priestley’s vision of post-apocalyptic Britain in Summer Day’s Dream (1949); an adaptation of Stevenson’s The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde (1950) and Wells’s little-known satire The Wonderful Visit (1952), where an angel attempts to adapt to human society. The children’s serial Stranger From Space, where a young boy befriends a marooned Martian, also ran for two series from 1951. Time Slip, screened in 1953, was the intriguing story of a man 4.7 seconds ahead in time from the rest of the world.

Writer Nigel Kneale, a key figure in the development of science fiction on British television, captured a sense of Britain’s changing fortunes in the 1950s as it was increasingly dominated by science and technology and its culture became heavily influenced by American consumerism. Kneale cut his teeth adapting 1952’s psychic alien possession drama Mystery Story and nuclear thriller Number Three in 1953 after joining the new Script Unit at the BBC in 1951. Both plays critiqued the pursuit of scientific knowledge and coincided with the optimism of the Festival of Britain, the debut of the Comet jet aircraft and the imminent completion of Britain’s first nuclear power station.
‘A countless host… with one single consciousness’
Viennese cinema director Rudolph Cartier arrived at the BBC in 1950 and worked with Kneale adapting Arrow to the Heart in 1952. The urgent need to fill a Saturday night slot in the BBC schedule gave them an opportunity to push the technical and stylistic potential of television with their ‘thriller in six parts’, 1953’s The Quatermass Experiment.

Cartier eschewed the intimacy of previous BBC dramas and brought his cinematic vision to bear upon Kneale’s human story of an astronaut who returns to Earth possessed by an alien entity. The exploits of the anti-establishment scientist with a conscience, Bernard Quatermass, gripped an audience of five million viewers and a British science fiction legend was born.

Cartier and Kneale next confidently tackled an adaptation of Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four and its broadcast in 1954 caused complaints and questions in Parliament. Cartier again sought a broader scale, using over twenty sets and pre-filmed inserts, to adapt Orwell’s austere, totalitarian science fiction polemic.

It tapped into the still raw emotions about the darkest days of the Second World War and the fresh anxieties about the Cold War. The play’s final scenes, the torture of hero Winston Smith played by Peter Cushing, in Room 101 proved to be too graphic for BBC viewers. Yet, despite the protests about its 12th December debut the BBC repeated the play on the 16th December.

Simultaneously, when the makers of Nineteen Eighty-Four were described as ‘sadists and readers of Horror comics’, this reflected concerns about a creeping Americanisation of British culture through its SF and horror magazines and comic books. Hollywood’s own mix of paranoia and spectacle in the era’s science fiction film boom saw the genre gradually becoming a mass medium entertainment.

The arrival of the BBC’s commercial rival ITV in 1955 merely added fuel to the debate about high and low culture. Kneale and Cartier returned in the same year with Quatermass II, a deeply paranoid, pessimistic alien possession thriller that, as James Chapman noted, said a great deal more about ‘national impotence’ as Britain struggled to come to terms with its fading global influence. Quatermass and the Pit in 1958 upped the ante with a claustrophobic tale about humanity’s violent ancestral Martian legacy, fashioning an SF allegory from Britain’s colonial past and the race riots of that summer.

With his characteristic conservative pessimism, Kneale produced further plays in the genre in the decade that followed. The Creature, another starring vehicle for Peter Cushing and made prior to Quatermass II, was about an expedition to find the legendary Yeti. After a period working on film scripts, Kneale provided a ghost story with a twist about 18th century villagers haunted by a future nuclear apocalypse in 1963’s The Road. Sadly, the play does not survive in the archive. He also worked with director Michael Elliott in 1964 on ATV’s nuclear thriller The Crunch.

Another Kneale-Elliott collaboration The Year of the Sex Olympics in 1968, a psychedelic expression of what Adam Curtis noted as ‘the paranoia that was beginning to seep into the left at the end of the 1960s’, was a chillingly prescient satire about the influence of mass media and reality television that continues to resonate today.

The Quatermass Experiment ©BBC 1953

By the start of the 1960s the BBC’s commercial rivals ITV had captured the ratings with mass market, popular programmes, not only filling their schedules with slickly made imports but also with indigenous plays, series and serials. Associated Rediffusion and ABC produced many SF themed dramas in this period, primarily obsessing about misguided scientists and their failed attempts to launch rockets, encroaching apocalypse and its consequences.

David Karp’s One (1956), Priestley’s Doomsday for Dyson (1958), Lester Fuller’s Before the Sun Goes Down (1959), Murder Club — an adaptation of Robert Sheckley’s The Tenth Victim — and Giles Cooper’s Loop (1963), about an invasion via outside TV broadcasts, and his adaptation of John Lymington’s The Night of the Big Heat (1961) were just a few of the plays from this period.

One of the key figures responsible for the radical reshaping of drama at ITV franchise ABC was Canadian drama producer Sydney Newman. With the Armchair Theatre drama anthology he produced a series of plays that drew audiences of up to 12 million viewers and brought realism and new writers to the fore.

He also supervised children’s drama and in 1960 commissioned Malcolm Hulke and Eric Paice’s six part Sunday afternoon serial Target Luna, about Buchan Island’s experimental rocket group headed by Norman Wedgewood, his children Geoff, Jimmy and Valerie, journalist Conway Henderson and a hamster called Hamlet.

It was so successful it spawned three equally popular sequels, Pathfinders in Space, Pathfinders to Mars and Pathfinders to Venus. The various exploits of Wedgewood, the children and Henderson took them to Mars and Venus in fast paced, positivist adventure serials that blended science fact with the wonders and terrors of space exploration. While the production values were primitive, the Pathfinders trilogy set an ambitious template for popular children’s science fiction television in the 1960s.

Newman also reinvigorated ABC’s Saturday night schedule when he developed The Avengers, a Cold War espionage thriller that gradually transformed into a quirky escapist fantasy, its reassuring traditionalism and sophisticated modernity becoming the epitome of 1960s meritocratic pop. Many episodes of The Avengers, particularly when it moved from a studio VT to all film production, embraced science fiction concepts as suave British spy John Steed set out to foil diabolical masterminds of all inclinations.
‘Twenty robots… whirling through the universe with a sense of evil.’
1962’s Dumb Martian, an adaptation of John Wyndham’s short story and allegory about racism and domestic abuse that featured a space pioneer purchasing a mute Martian wife for company, was shown in the Armchair Theatre strand. Its story editor Irene Shubik had joined ABC in 1960, commissioning a number of fantasy themed scripts for Armchair Theatre and used the adaptation to launch her science fiction anthology series Out of this World. The only surviving episode, her adaptation of Isaac Asimov’s Little Lost Robot, exploring the ethics of creating a race of artificial intelligences, received a welcome DVD release by the BFI in 2014.

She established contact with agent John Carnell, who had founded science fiction magazine New Worlds and had many SF writers on his books, and together they selected the short stories for adaptation. Its range of literate, thought-provoking adaptations demonstrated that American and British science fiction were contemporary bedfellows, with stories by Asimov, Clifford Simak and Philip K Dick rubbing shoulders with new scripts from Terry Nation and Richard Waring. These were connections Shubik would exploit when she and Newman moved to the BBC.

The BBC had, meanwhile, scored another success with the seven part serial A For Andromeda in 1961. Noted astronomer and cosmologist Fred Hoyle and producer John Elliot created an eerie story about a group of scientists who receive extra terrestrial instructions to design and build an advanced computer and create a life form, Andromeda. Once again, it was a drama focused on Cold War suspicions and paranoia, fears of technological advancement as well as the moral and ethical conflicts between idealistic science and government bureaucracy. Its sequel The Andromeda Breakthrough in 1962 developed the themes further into a critique of the degradation of science under capitalism.

Doctor Who ©BBC 1963

When Sydney Newman moved to the BBC in December 1962, he set about reorganising the Drama department. Prior to this Alice Frick, Donald Bull and John Braybon of the BBC Survey Group had compiled internal reports about science fiction, drama and audiences, referencing A for Andromeda and Out of this World. The reports would stimulate Newman’s desire to create a new series for Saturday tea time. He recruited his former ABC production assistant Verity Lambert to produce what would become the longest running science fiction series in the world, Doctor Who.

In November 1963 a British cultural phenomenon made its debut and Doctor Who then cemented its success when Lambert convinced Newman that Terry Nation’s seven-part story The Daleks (aka The Mutants) did not violate his rule against ‘bug-eyed monsters’ or his remit for the series to be scientifically and historically educational. The series’ longevity was assured when the Daleks made their first appearance in December 1963. Since then, its format has embraced hard science fiction, historic adventure, fantasy, Gothic horror and satire. Its appeal to generations old and new continues unabated by dint of the production team’s remarkable decision in 1966 to 'regenerate' its leading man.

Nation’s renewed affinity for science fiction also inspired Irene Shubik, who also moved with Newman to the BBC, and she asked him to adapt Isaac Asimov’s novel The Caves of Steel for drama anthology Story Parade in 1964. Starring Peter Cushing as detective Elijah Bailey, the play concerned itself with his investigation of the murder of an eminent scientist and the developing relationship with his partner on the case, the robot R. Daneel Olivaw. A detective mystery, it also provided Shubik with a social commentary on xenophobia, over-population and the impact of technology on human behavior.

During production of Story Parade, Shubik proposed a science fiction anthology to Newman and commissioned the first 13 scripts for what became the landmark BBC2 series, Out of the Unknown. Shubik produced a daring, provocative and ambitious showcase of British and American writers, resolutely using science fiction as a vehicle to examine contemporary anxieties and concerns through allegory, metaphor and satire.

Out of the Unknown ©BBC 1966

Stories by Pohl, Ballard, Asimov, Simak, Brunner were adapted by the cream of British scriptwriters and, later, new scripts were commissioned from Nigel Kneale, Brian Hayles and Michael J Bird. As Mark Ward eloquently notes within the BFI DVD release of the 20 surviving episodes, its space age, swinging sixties currency may be passé but the series’ examinations of ‘the individual, the state, human identity, law and order, education, consumerism, medicine, war and so on, still concern us.’

While Out of the Unknown engaged intellectually with the genre, ABC’s Undermind in 1965 offered more of the same with its post-Quatermass alien conspiracy theme about an anarchic alien fifth column threatening Britain’s security. The BBC attempted to emulate the stylish heroics of The Avengers and ITC’s action adventure series with displaced Edwardian crime fighter Adam Adamant Lives! and Bondian alien secret agents led by Simon King, thwarting alien invasions in Counterstrike.

ITV’s schedules were also dominated by American imports from the Irwin Allen stable including Lost in Space, Land of the Giants and Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea. Homegrown series for ITV were primarily the responsibility of Gerry and Sylvia Anderson who scored enormous success with their filmed Supermarionation puppet series.

Supercar, Fireball XL5, Thunderbirds and Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons, made for ITC during the 1960s, captured the essence of the space age and the post-war utopian ideal man working in harmony with technology. Crucially the blend of action and adventure with innovative visual effects, transnational settings and instantly recognisable signature music secured lucrative international sales and broadcast.

Similarly ITC film series such as The Champions and Department S featured many episodes with a science fiction flavor but their jewel in the crown was surely The Prisoner. Like Kneale, its star Patrick McGoohan anticipated the ‘fall out’ from the swinging Sixties and the consequences of the culture wars between the establishment and the counterculture. His strange, surreal series about a secret agent who resigns and is interned in a bizarre Italianate detention centre to have his mind scoured for valuable information, was full of moral and ethical questions about freedom and conformity.

The Prisoner expressed something of the postmodern qualities of British science fiction literature as it underwent a radical transformation under Michael Moorcock’s editorship of New Worlds magazine. It had become a medium of ideas and styles and the sounding board for great social and cultural changes.

Television and film iterations also attempted to reflect the counterculture movement’s determination to put issues about environmentalism, poverty, racial and sexual equality on the mainstream agenda. By the 1970s, science fiction offered an opportunity for producers, writers and directors to comment on the unfulfilled utopian promises of the 1960s and explore many alternate coming of age realities.

Next time: Part Two / 1970–75: ‘Waiting for the collapse’ — From Doomwatch to The Changes





THE BLACK ARCHIVE #31: WARRIORS' GATE - Publication Announcement

$
0
0
I know, it's been a long time since I posted here. However, that's with good reason.

For about eighteen months I've been busy on two writing projects.

In November 2017, one of those took me to the BFI National Archives in Berkhamsted on the trail of a British director's archived papers. However, I can't say more at this point as the results are awaiting publication. You'll have to wait and see.

However, I had to juggle this in the middle of research for another project. This started with a pitch to Obverse Books in August 2017 for a volume in their ongoing book-length studies of single Doctor Who stories. It was a proposal to write a book about Stephen Gallagher's season 18 story, Warriors' Gate. With interesting stories about its production and a narrative and visual presentation ripe for interpretation, Gallagher's four-part serial offered something of a challenge. Obverse were willing to let me take that on.

I knew there was already a lot written about Warriors' Gate and there was plenty of material out there to wade through. After establishing a reasonably accurate outline of the production and its problems through desk research, it was off to the BBC Written Archives for a good delve through the production paperwork. This was in hope of turning up new information and also confirming some nebulous details about the dates and stages of production.

At the same time, I was fortunate enough to start a correspondence with Stephen Gallagher and the director of Warriors' Gate, Paul Joyce. Gallagher and Joyce were both very supportive of the book and, having received their blessing, I was confident enough to sound them out on a regular basis about certain matters. Several friends directed me to other material and I trotted off to University of Hull Archives at the Hull History Centre to sift through Stephen's archives, intent on tracing his radio drama career and the development of the scripts for Warriors' Gate. This research gobbled up about six months and took far longer than I expected and yielded an overwhelming amount of material.

The first draft sputtered into life around April 2018 after I'd returned from Hull. Writing continued for a sustained period until August. You may have seen quite a few tweets about this process. I was then more prepared to arrange to meet with Paul Joyce and spent a hot August afternoon in Ramsgate chatting to a fiercely intelligent man, bursting with stories and anecdotes about his career. Eventually, some of this material fed into the draft manuscripts. A further intense burst of writing took me to the end of 2018 and, as it gave way to 2019, a completed manuscript emerged.

Now, after much editing and reshaping over the last three months, The Black Archive: Warriors' Gate has escaped from E-Space and is up forpre-order

Here's the book blurb:

'The shadow of my past and of your future.'

Representative of Doctor Who at its most experimental, narratively and visually, Warriors’ Gate (1981) was the rich by-product of a producer seeking to modernise the series for the 1980s, a radio writer and novelist who had never written for television, and a film director with one television drama to his credit. 

Examining television authorship in the 1980s, and using archive research and new interviews, this Black Archive traces the development of writer Stephen Gallagher’s scripts and their onscreen realisation by producer John Nathan-Turner, script editor Christopher Bidmead, and director Paul Joyce. Similarly, it explores the story’s complex blend of absurd tragicomedy, quantum theory, randomness and entropy, within the context of British New Wave SF, the philosophy of science, modernist theatre, film and television, German Romantic painting, pop video, and the development of electronic video effects.

Many ‘authors’ contributed to the transmitted version of Warriors’ Gate and the book also    considers whether it can be claimed as the work of a single author given the collaborative nature of its troubled production. This is examined in relation to the director’s approach to television style and authorship and the significance of writer-producer-director hierarchies in the evolution of television drama since the 1980s.
 
Enjoy. I hope I've done it justice.


10TH ANNIVERSARY COMPETITION: Win Doctor Who - The Book of Whoniversal Records

$
0
0
It's the end, but the moment has been prepared for. Yes, it's the last of our 10th Anniversary competitions celebrating a decade of blogging and, generally, babbling to ourselves here atCathode Ray Tube.  

Those lovely people at BBC Books and Penguin Random House have provided us with a great giveaway for this week's competition in the form of Simon Guerrier's very entertaining Doctor Who: The Book of Whoiversal Records

This is a fact-packed, fully illustrated celebration of the best, biggest and most impossible moments from the world of Doctor Who.

The Doctor Who Book of Whoniversal Recordsis a celebration of the greatest – and strangest – achievements from the brilliant, impossible world of Doctor Who. Bursting with firsts and bests both human and alien – from the biggest explosion in the universe to the first human to time-travel; from the longest fall through space to the shortest life-form that ever lived – this book will answer all of your burning questions about the last of the Time Lords and his adventures through time and space. 

These are feats literally impossible to try at home – but Whoniversal Records has the photographs to prove they happened! Packed with astounding facts, figures, and fun, The Book of Whoniversal Records is the ultimate must-have for Doctor Who fans everywhere (and every-when!). 


COMPETITION
Cathode Ray Tube has one copy of Whoniversal Records to give away to one lucky winner courtesy of BBC Books and Penguin Random House. Simply answer the question below and submit your entry via email.

  • - This competition is open to residents of the UK only but not to employees of BBC Books and Penguin Random House or their agents. 

  • - Entries must be received by midnight GMT on Friday 6th October 2017.

  • - This offer cannot be used in conjunction with any other offer and no cash alternative is available.

  • - No responsibility will be accepted for delayed, mislaid, lost or damaged entries whether due to system error or otherwise.

  • - Only one entry per visitor per day. No multiple entries allowed. Entries sent using answers posted on competition websites will be deemed void. We know who you are!

  • - The winner will be the first entry with the correct answer drawn at random.

  • - The winner will be contacted by email and the books will be sent by first class post to the winner after the competition closes.

  • - The judges' decision is final and no correspondence will be entered into.

  • - Entrants are deemed to accept and be bound by these rules and entries that are not in accordance with the rules will be disqualified.

  • - By entering the free prize draw, entrants agree to be bound by any other requirements set out on this website. Entry is via email to frank_c_collins@hotmail.com. No responsibility can be accepted for entries not received, only partially received or delayed for whatever reason. Paper entries are not valid.
Question: Who provided the very first 'monster voice' in an episode of Doctor Who?

Email your answer to the question above, with your name and address, including post code, and we'll enter you into the prize draw.

Good luck!

BIRDY: Limited Edition Blu-Ray - Notes on an essay

$
0
0
Due for release on 28 October 2019 by Indicator, this limited edition Blu-Ray of Alan Parker's film Birdy (1984) features my new essay on the film in the booklet that accompanies the first pressing.

Birdy remains one of my favourite films of the 1980s and the commission to write the new essay from Powerhouse was an opportunity to not only revisit a film I had seen on release and revisited on VHS and DVD but also to return to the original novel by William Wharton.

The essay, ‘In a dream, I'm trying to decide what I am’, attempts to track the development of the script prior to Parker's involvement and how Wharton's strange, often abstract, narrative about the transformation of two friends in the aftermath of the Second World War (it was altered to the Vietnam conflict for the film) was brought to the screen by Parker.

Birdy is another iteration of Wharton's personality, one forged through his participation in the War, his relatively poor background and his childhood obsessions.Tracing the numerous avatars of Wharton involved a close re-reading of the novel Birdy and Wharton's posthumous war biography Shrapnel, tracing Wharton's double life - as abstract painter and author - through numerous interviews, in documents on Parker's own website, and then trying to tie those in with a delve through Parker's papers, donated to the BFI archives.

The papers at the BFI provided a fascinating insight into how Parker shaped Sandy Kroopf and Jack Behr’s script and attempted to retain as much of the ‘the “one person” schizophrenia of the book’ and remain true to the author's identity or identities.

Thanks to Nigel Good and Carolyne Bevan of the BFI Special Collections team I was able to access the draft scripts, Parker's letters and memos about the script, the notes on use of Garrett Brown's Skycam to shoot some of the flying sequences, technical notes about canaries, and his correspondence with Michael Reidenback. Reidenback, hoping to secure a role in the film, eventually provided Parker with a lot of research into army psychiatric units and their treatments of mental patients in the post-Vietnam era. This material left the impression that Parker clearly wanted to get the details right about what we eventually saw on screen. It also shed some further light on Wharton's own elusive personality and reclusive life.

The original draft of the essay was approximately 4600 words by November 2017. By the time I delivered the final draft, in December 2017, this had been reshaped and edited to approximately 3000 words. Finally, this release of Birdy has been a little while coming but it is heartening to know that this was not only down to Indicator's desire to secure Parker for a commentary and produce a number of relevant special features but also to go the extra mile and commission a new 2K remaster of the film.

But here it is at last. Enjoy.

INDICATOR LIMITED EDITION BLU-RAY SPECIAL FEATURES:
  • New 2K remaster supervised and approved by director Alan Parker
  • Original stereo audio
  • New and exclusive audio commentary with director Alan Parker and the BFI’s Justin Johnson
  • Learning to Fly (2019): new and exclusive interview with screenwriters Jack Behr and Sandy Kroopf
  • Keith Gordon on William Wharton (2019): the actor and filmmaker shares his experiences of adapting Wharton for the screen
  • No Hard Feelings (1974): Alan Parker’s early film is an unsentimental view of wartime London through the eyes of a troubled young man
  • Original theatrical trailer
  • Image gallery: on-set and promotional photography
  • New and improved English subtitles for the deaf and hard-of-hearing
  • Limited edition exclusive booklet with a new essay by Frank Collins, an overview of contemporary critical responses, archival articles, and film credits
  • Limited Edition of 5,000 copies
  • All extras subject to change
#PHILTD028
BBFC cert: 15
REGION FREE
EAN: 5037899071083

Purchase directly from the Powerhouse website.

FATHERLAND: LIMITED EDITION BLU-RAY - NOTES ON AN ESSAY

$
0
0

Due for release by Indicator on 19 April 2021, this limited edition Blu-Ray of Ken Loach's Fatherland(1986) features my new essay on the film in the booklet that accompanies the first pressing.

Loach's film, which was released after a period in the late 1970s and early 1980s where he found it difficult to get work commissioned and financed, is all the more intriguing in that it was his only collaboration, to date, with the much admired writer Trevor Griffiths. Griffiths a successful theatre playwright had, like Loach, moved from television and into cinema. Both had a formidable creative and political sensibility running throughout their work and my essay, 'Third Man', chronicles their interweaving, parallel careers through to the development and writing of Fatherland.

My own interest in Loach's and Griffiths' work has grown since I first watched Fatherland on Channel 4 (who had co-funded the film) in the late 1980s. I was happy to revisit their careers to fulfil the essay brief to contextualise their work and its political drive. With a particular focus on Griffiths, the essay discusses each of Fatherland's collaborators, their shared politics of the left, their work for theatre, television and cinema and the way each has developed their own voice through their respective techniques in directing and writing. It also underlines their differences, coming into sharp relief in the many compromises that both had to make during the making of Fatherland. Each had something to say in the film, often from different perspectives, about media, culture and history, Europe and political struggle in a decade where the left was in retreat, particularly in Britain.

As this essay was researched and written last summer, during the lockdown in May and June 2020, it was a challenge to complete it while voluntarily shielding and on furlough. The impact of the coronavirus also prevented me from looking through Loach's and Griffiths' papers held at the BFI national archive. This was particularly upsetting as it would have been very rewarding to look more closely at the development of Fatherland's script and the correspondence between Loach and Griffiths. Fortunately, David Archibald's article on Loach's approach to acting, written for The Drouth in 2018, offered some of those insights from the archive.

I also had some familiarity with Griffiths' television work when I had first researched and reviewed his superb political drama Bill Brand, made for Thames in 1976 and released on DVD in 2011. The material gathered for that review was then extended through a deep read of several texts on Griffiths and Loach as well as newspaper and magazine research (thanks to the access provided by Manchester Central Library's online newspaper archives and to Film Comment's invaluable online archive during the first lockdown) to uncover contemporary interviews with Loach and Griffiths when Fatherland was released in 1986. 

I am particularly indebted to the work, published since the 1980s, of Graham Fuller, Stanton B. Garner, John Hill, Stephen Lacey, Jacob Leigh and John Tulloch whose chapters and books on the work of Loach, Griffiths and producer Tony Garnett were extremely helpful in the writing of the essay. 

The initial draft originally came in at 3600 words and through about three further drafts this came down to 3185 (still over the word count) in the final edit. Although a large chunk of about 145 words was cut without too much consequence during that last edit, the loss of an extended section on Barry Hines' two-part television play The Price of Coal (1977) was somewhat unfortunate. It was a pleasure writing this essay while re-visiting the politically prescient Fatherland, a somewhat neglected Loach film. I hope it offers the relevant context to those who may be unfamiliar with much of Griffiths' work in theatre, television and film prior to his collaboration with Loach.

FATHERLAND - INDICATOR LIMITED EDITION BLU-RAY SPECIAL FEATURES

  • High Definition remaster
  • Original mono audio
  • Language Barriers (2021): new interview with editor Jonathan Morris
  • Talk About Work (1971): Ken Loach’s documentary for the Central Office of Information, photographed by Chris Menges, interviewing young people about their work
  • Right to Work March (1972): documentary film of a five-week protest march from Glasgow to London that saw the participation of a number of cultural figures, including Loach and other filmmakers
  • Image gallery: publicity and promotional material
  • New and improved English subtitles for the deaf and hard-of-hearing
  • Limited edition exclusive booklet with a new essay by Frank Collins, an archival interview with Ken Loach, an extract from Loach on Loach, an overview of contemporary critical responses, new writing on the short films, and film credits
  • UK premiere on Blu-ray
  • Limited edition of 3,000 copies
     

#PHILTD136
BBFC cert: 15
REGION FREE
EAN: 5060697920192


It's good to see some of Loach's less regarded work on Blu-ray with Indicator's release of Fatherland alongside their limited edition of Loach's Carla's Song (1996) in April 2021. Both are available to pre-orderfrom their website.


UPDATE 2021-22: THE BLACK ARCHIVE: KINDA, ROBIN HOOD AT HAMMER, CAPTAIN CLEGG, and DOCTOR WHO MAGAZINE

$
0
0

Friends, firstly apologies for not keeping the updates coming. 

The last two and a bit years have been turbulent and distressing for everyone and I hope this message finds you all well. While Brexit, Covid and the war in Ukraine have surely impacted on us all, I have been keeping myself busy working on several freelance commissions and thought it was time for an update.

THE BLACK ARCHIVE: KINDA (Obverse Books - forthcoming. Due December 2022)

Just as Covid restricted us all to working from home or furlough or no job at all, I was in the middle of researching and writing for the forthcoming Obverse Books Black Archive on Kinda. It's a particular favourite of mine from Season 19 of Doctor Who. After publishing the book about Warriors' Gate in 2019, I fancied the challenge of writing about what has come to be regarded, despite its flaws, as one of the most intriguing stories in the canon. At this stage, I don't want to say much about the book. The research at BBC Written Archives, after much delay because of Covid, was completed in August last year but that was the icing on a particular cake in terms of where this book led me and the new insights I've been provided with. 

With Obverse switching back to a bi-monthly publication schedule after the book was commissioned, I had a generous amount of time to write and I hope the results will have been worth it. The current manuscript is now with my editor at Obverse and I have no doubt we'll be going through that in due course as we hit the run-up to publication this year. I'm quietly excited for this one.



ROBIN HOOD AT HAMMER: Two Tales From Sherwood Forest (Due for release in August 2022)

I'm currently putting the final touches to an essay for the book that will accompany Indicator's forthcoming Blu-ray release of Hammer's Sword of Sherwood Forestand A Challenge for Robin Hood, the two films featuring the quintessentially British character that the studio made in the 1960s.

From Indicator's site:

"For 1960’s Sword of Sherwood Forest, Richard Greene (The Blood of Fu Manchu, The Castle of Fu Manchu) reprises the role he made famous in the classic television series The Adventures of Robin Hood. Directed by Terence Fisher (The Gorgon, The Revenge of Frankenstein), and starring Peter Cushing (The Devil’s Men, Corruption) as the dastardly Sheriff of Nottingham, the film sees Robin Hood thwart a plot to assassinate the Archbishop of Canterbury (Jack Gwillm, Jason and the Argonauts, The Curse of the Mummy’s Tomb). The film also boasts an uncredited early role for Oliver Reed (The System, The Damned).

In 1967’s A Challenge for Robin Hood, Barrie Ingham (The Day of the Jackal) dons the Lincoln green as he and his merrie men hide out in Sherwood Forest after his cousin (Peter Blythe, Frankenstein Created Woman) frames him for murder. This action-packed adventure features acting support from Gay Hamilton (Barry Lyndon, The Duellists) and Leon Greene (Adventures of a Private Eye, Adventures of a Plumber’s Mate).

This 2-disc Limited Edition set contains a double-sided poster, an 80-page book, and extensive new and archival extra features, including the much-loved Children’s Film Foundation film Robin Hood Junior (1975), starring Keith Chegwin (Multi-Coloured Swap Shop, Cheggers Plays Pop) as the diminutive hero."

DOCTOR WHO MAGAZINE

Back in September 2021 it was also a pleasure to be asked to review BBC Studios Blu-ray release of the animated The Evil of the Daleks for DOCTOR WHO MAGAZINE issue 570, which hit the stands last October. 

My thanks to the team for asking me to contribute to a magazine I've been reading since it first appeared as a Marvel weekly in 1979. The Evil of the Daleks is also a firm favourite so it was serendipitous that my first contribution was an opportunity to review its animated reincarnation.

HAMMER VOLUME SIX: Night Shadows - Limited Edition (Released June 2021)

I completed a further commission for Indicator's box set release last summer and wrote the essay for the booklet accompanying the Blu-ray edition of Hammer's Captain Clegg for this release. It was a great opportunity to write about a Hammer film I had such a soft spot for and I spent some time researching the life and times of Russell Thorndyke, the author of the original books that Hammer's Captain Clegg was inspired by and to understand where the character of Clegg originated.

"Hammer Volume Six: Night Shadows revives four consummate Hammer classics from the early sixties, exemplifying some of Hammer's best work in the horror and thriller genres. Edgar Allan Poe looms large in The Shadow of the Cat, a macabre ‘old dark house’ tale of feline revenge, starring André Morell (Cash on Demand) and Barbara Shelley (The Camp on Blood Island); Peter Cushing (The GorgonCorruption) and Oliver Reed (The Scarlet Blade) star in Captain Clegg, which sees Hammer fuse horror and adventure in an eighteenth-century-set tale of smugglers and marsh phantoms; Herbert Lom (Mysterious Island) stars as The Phantom of the Opera in Hammer’s acclaimed production of Gaston Leroux’s Gothic classic, whilst Freddie Francis (Torture Garden) directs Nightmare, a spooky psychological thriller in the Les Diaboliques vein, which benefits from full-blooded central performances by Moira Redmond (Jigsaw) and Jennie Linden (A Severed Head). 

This collection contains a wealth of new and archival extra features, including documentaries and appreciations, interviews with actors and crew members, audio commentaries, and extensive booklets. Strictly limited to 6,000 numbered units." 

DOCTOR WHO: The Time of the Doctor / Review

$
0
0
The Time of the Doctor
BBC One HD
25 December 2013, 7.30pm

Your stomach's fit to burst and only until you force down yet another luxury chocolate or another branded bit of confectionary from a selection box do you realise that perhaps you've overindulged at Christmas. Yet, you keep going back for more. You pile into turkey, Christmas pudding, mince pies as if you've never seen such a feast before. But you've seen it and eaten it all before. You do it every year.

Sorry, I was digressing. Just thinking about my Christmas dinner again. Oddly enough, the after effects - flatulence and indigestion - did not abate watching The Time of the Doctor. For an end of era story, featuring a regeneration to boot, it felt as if Steven Moffat was devouring a running buffet of the last three seasons under his auspices. Another bowl of fish custard, anyone? One more slice of turkey?
Moffat's trilogy, beginning with The Name of the Doctor, continuing in The Day of the Doctor and concluding here, is firmly centred on the impending change from Matt Smith to Peter Capaldi but it is also an attempt to deal with 'the final problem'. What happens when the Doctor reaches his final incarnation and how does the show get past the 'rule' of thirteen Doctors as set down by Robert Holmes in 1976's The Deadly Assassin? In the anniversary year Moffat is clearly on a mission to deal with this shibboleth and, as is customary, break every rule in the book.
'I can change 12 times. 13 versions of me'
The Time of the Doctor's entire running time therefore reduces down, a bit like a red wine sauce, to one very crucial exchange between Clara and the aged Eleventh Doctor. It's just after half way through the episode when Clara assures the Doctor he can change again. 'No, not for ever. I can change 12 times. 13 versions of me,' explains the Doctor. Clara, as our representative canon keeper, tells him he's number 11. Moffat, having already wedged in John Hurt's Doctor between McGann and Eccleston, triumphantly waggles his finger and reminds us that back in Journey's End: 'Number 10 once regenerated and kept the same face.'

So there you have the problem. Now for the solution. Clearly there are a number of plot points to deal with from The Day of the Doctorregarding the Time Lords. Were they saved in another universe as was postulated? Will the Doctor find them and restore them to our universe? Moffat essentially deals with the regeneration question and the Time Lords rather adeptly but the resolution on its own could never fill an hour's television.

Like many of Moffat's grander episodes, especially his season finales, we get a modicum of plot floating in a sea of random ideas (wooden Cybermen, anyone?), highly crafted and exceptional visuals, and what feels like a race against the running time to answer all of the nagging questions he's littered the series with since 2010.

The episode opens with a typical Moffat trope. The fairy tale introduction of 'once upon a time...' If anything can be said about the Matt Smith era then the use of fairy or folk tale and mythology (not just the classic variety but also the show's own in-built history) is vital to the construction and definition of the Doctor during Moffat's tenure.

Series 5 was wholly focused on the 'crack in the universe' arc and how the restitution of the shattering universe was tied into the maturing of the companion, Amy Pond and the Peter Pan/Wendy relationship between her and the Doctor; Series 6 was busy exploring the origins of River Song and her marriage, the fairy tale mystique of 'the perfect husband', her initial role in the Silence's campaign to destroy the Doctor and his own demystification; Series 7 was focused on the name of the Doctor and the power of the Time Lord's mythology.

All these specific story arcs can very neatly fit into the definition and purpose of folk tale as determined by Vladimir Propp, for example. His examination of the Russian folk tale as a series of functions works very well in context with Doctor Who, outlining the role of the hero and villain and specific motifs. For Moffat, The Time of the Doctor is an opportunity to return to many of his own motifs and replay them to examine the psychology of the Doctor, his relationship with a specific community (Time Lords, the inhabitants of Christmas town and, briefly, Clara's family) and the cosmology of the universe (the religious zeal of his enemies and their desire to wipe him and the Time Lords out, the causation of the crack in the universe, the actual passage of time).

Tasha Lem announces that 'once there was a planet' which sent out a message to the universe. Messages, hidden or in plain sight, are another Moffat trope. They've been in his episodes since Blink's warning behind the wallpaper. Characters are always offering the Doctor a cryptic warning, an interdiction to seek out some useful piece of knowledge, and here it's 'a bell tolling among the stars' returning us to the vexed question of 'Doctor Who?', something which seems to have perplexed Moffat for some time.

The problem is I don't really care about that question. I've never asked the question because I already know the answer, as do many millions of fans I suspect. Moffat is worried we are still asking that question some 50 years after the series started. The 'Doctor Who?' gag worked well in An Unearthly Child but we got the joke long ago and I think you can stop embarrassing yourself Steven.

Fair enough that it's partly understandable in the context of an exploration of the Doctor's mythology but the fact that no one still knows his real name is an itch Moffat obsessively scratches at. The expression of the Doctor's mythology in The Day of the Doctor, where Moffat delivered a satisfying re-statement of the iconic nature of the title hero, is somewhat deflated by returning to the leftover plot elements of The Wedding of River Song and The Name of the Doctor.

There is a feeling of inevitability to The Time of the Doctor. The return to Trenzalore to hear the oldest question in the universe answered is as welcome as the undercooked turkey sitting in the innards of the TARDIS. That the name is a password to facilitate the return of the Time Lords brings it all to the attention of his enemies. Just as in The Big Bang, their ships mass above the Doctor's head. It's a way for Moffat to throw in the monsters and explosions as he tries to bring closure to many of his hanging narratives.

One of the nonsensical moments in the episode is right there in the pre-titles sequence. Why does the Doctor randomly teleport onto a Dalek ship carrying a bit of a Dalek? Why does he rely on Handles to do this for him? Is he unable to identify Dalek ships these days without the aid of a disembodied Cyberman head?

There are sophisticated scanners on the TARDIS which he clearly uses to identify the ships after he's risked life and limb to visit them. Where's the sense in that? The only joy in that scene is to see lots of Daleks ranting at the Doctor. And how many times have we seen that? As if to ram home the point Moffat repeats it again by sending the Doctor and Handles to a ship full of Cybermen. The duplication of a scene within minutes must be a bit of record and it feels distinctly like padding.

It's structurally a very elaborate set up for Handles the Cyberman where the whole business of patching the telephone back to the console is a bit of joke about the role of the companion and their facility to act as the audience's representative, constantly and repetitively asking for the answer to the bleeding obvious.

Paying off later in the episode, it's an uncomplicated relationship and the question of a companion's loyalty, friendship and emotional baggage - the 'feels' as the modern kids are keen to describe them - is thrown into sharp relief by a lump of metal with two jug ears. Remember when Tom Baker thought a talking cabbage would make a good companion...

In stark contrast we get Clara ringing the Doctor up and pleading with him to be her 'boyfriend' because she's having a shit Christmas Day with her relatives and the cooking of a turkey seems to be beyond an intelligent woman who is supposed to be a teacher? Mind you, she was terrible at making soufflés. Ironically, Clara jokes about the turkey being 'dead and decapitated' as usual for Christmas. Is Handles the talking turkey, then? Or is the episode considered ready for stuffing?

We're back again into the 'imaginary friend' trope. The Raggedy Man does seem to attract obsessive types. If it isn't Amelia Pond going doolally after meeting the Doctor as a child then it's Clara demanding his presence at table because she's so insecure she can't be an independent single woman without inventing a boyfriend. She's really rather pathetic begging him on the phone to 'come to Christmas dinner and be my Christmas date'. As a character she's still lacking in consistency.

Clara's family seems to have undergone a change. Her dad seems to have aged terribly since we last saw him (a result of re-casting it seems) in The Rings of Akhaten and he's saddled with a snooty, scornful girlfriend, Linda. When the TARDIS lands at the Powell Estate (yes, your eyes are not deceiving you - it's the same location as used in Rose) you half expect Jackie and Rose to invite the Doctor in.
'dead and decapitated'  
He certainly had a better time of it round theirs in The Christmas Invasion after all and he didn't have to show up stark bollock naked or slap his companion on her arse to get some attention. Just more bewildering attempts at comedy in an attempt to work in another of those ideas - hologram clothes - that have nothing of relevance to the story but Moffat seems to think we'll enjoy. So you go to church wearing hologram clothes and spend the entire episode naked? Really? Because 'we're all naked underneath'? A clumsy old metaphor if ever there was one.

And the really good metaphor is about the turkey. Clara is so inept at cooking and having boyfriends that she has to use the TARDIS to vortex cook the poor dead bird. 'It'll either come up a treat, or possibly lay some eggs,' warns the Doctor. The latter in the case of The Time of the Doctor.

The use of the family really does echo back to the RTD era and the best it can achieve here is with the character of Gran, a lovely little turn by Sheila Reid, who seems to be the only one to emotionally connect with the ridiculous presence of the Doctor and, later, with a depressed Clara who has been returned to Earth by the Doctor to keep her safe. Gran's age and wisdom runs in parallel with the aged Doctor sitting and philosophising in the church on war torn Trenzalore.

It's only until we've got the boyfriend meeting the family at Christmas and turkey out of the way that we finally get back to the rudiments of the plot and the elements left unresolved from the last three seasons.

Of course nothing is straight-forward in Moffat's world. At first we're told that the planet around which the Doctor's enemies mass and from the where the message originates is Gallifrey but as the Doctor points out to the talking cabbage... sorry Handles... he knows Gallifrey when he sees it and that isn't it. Which is handy when the Papal Mainframe pops up and the Mother Superious, Tasha Lem, invites them to her security church. A step up, but not much, from a security kitchen then. A religious order that controls the universe and is 'keeping you safe in this world and the next' could do with a security chapel and a security choir stall. 

And it's here that we get to the more interesting aspects of a flabby story. Beyond the smoke and mirrors of daft ideas, one of the central themes here is about religions and factions seeking control over a war. Moffat places this in contrast to the awkward family Christmas, the ritual we are left with at this time of year where people who don't really like each other force themselves to glut in celebration of a Christian calendar's appropriation of the pagan winter solstice.

He reflects on the season's Christian themes of rebirth and the Doctor's regeneration and the idea that Christmas town, an idealised snow covered place of contentment where innocent inhabitants can only be truthful, is some sort of symbol for the West Bank and Bethlehem's position in the Palestinian and Israeli battle for control of the region.

The Daleks, the Cybermen, the Silence and the Weeping Angels provide a visual analogy to the town's long history of being caught in decades of political, social and religious conflicts and the Doctor's slow path defence of Christmas town is a reminder of the tense sieges and the armed stand offs in Bethlehem. The security church maintains a truce over the planet and, acting as a peace keeping force, allows the Doctor down as some sort of special envoy. As the Doctor so eloquently sums up the plot 15 minutes in, 'sweet little town covered in snow, half the universe in terror', just as certain angels interrupt the proceedings.

We're back again to the idea of the the religious order setting out to destroy the Doctor as seen in A Good Man Goes To War. And then we have the femme fatale figure of Tasha Lem. A sultry figure before whom you must appear naked and who is just as fixated on the Doctor's history as River Song. Moffat's idea of strong women is, as always, questionable. He likes them powerful ('boss of the psycho space nuns') and - yes, for the final time - feisty but very needy. We've been here and done this many times before with River, with Irene Adler and other 'mother' figures. This time there's no mucking about and the shenanigans between the Doctor and 'Tash', frothing and flirting over a bed that looks like an altar, is all heavy handed and adolescent in its conflation of repression, sex and religion.

Still, let's give Moffat his due. He actually confesses rather smugly he's not very good at writing female characters by cracking a few jokes about it. Under the influence of the planet's truth field, even Clara confesses she's 'a bubbly personality masking bossy control freak' and, let's give a round of applause to the trope of all tropes, that she ran off with an alien because she fancied him. Oh, Lord.

Oh, and the idea that the Doctor can hide a TARDIS key in his wig is just more sleight of hand to get the TARDIS down to Christmas town and a bit of silliness, elbowing the audience in the ribs and saying, 'we know you know Matt had his hair cut for a film and we've had to give him a wig.' Oh, my sides.

Fortunately, now properly clothed and having landed on the planet, the Doctor and Clara can get back to the story and start dealing with all sorts of continuity references. The biggest is of course the crack in the wall the Doctor discovers in the church. Not only was the crack a major story arc in Series 5 but it was also the thing the Doctor most feared when he popped into room 11 of the hotel in The God Complex. Some quick flashbacks remind those of us who may have forgotten.

It's taken 20 minutes of frankly a lot of arsing about to actually get to the point where the Doctor realises that Handles has decoded a message from Gallifrey as it tries to re-enter our universe through the weakest point of the crack in reality. Cue frantic exchange of dialogue and the real consequence of the truth field designated by the Time Lords as a sort of galactic lie detector.

And yet another sleight of hand. The Doctor suddenly produces the seal of the High Council, which presumably has been gathering dust in his pocket since The Five Doctors in 1983, to decode the Time Lord's message. We could have avoided 20 minutes of arsing about if he'd just bothered to heed Handles telling him the message was from Gallifrey and fumbled in his pocket there and then. Handles, the bodiless prophet, decodes the message and reminds us of the other bodiless seer of Maldovar and Dorium's conversation with the Doctor in The Wedding of River Song.

He informed him of his impending death on Trenzalore and about 'The First Question, the oldest question in the Universe, that must never be answered, hidden in plain sight.' Time's up and the First Question needs to be answered truthfully but to do so would bring the Time Lords back to face the mass of enemies in orbit above the planet. The Time War would recommence. In order to prevent that the Doctor is forced to remain as a guardian over the planet, growing old and infirm as he protects the inhabitants of Christmas town against the various attacks from above.
'Raggedy man... Goodnight.' 
Silence falls because the Doctor must not speak his name. Trenzalore will burn if he does. In essesnce this again reaches back into fairy and folk tales and the power of names and naming. There are of course the well known magic words, the saying of something will make it happen, such as shazam or abracadabra. The Doctor's name is a word of power, a symbol of the uncanny in Moffat's world driven by the hidden and the unknowable.

The unnamed Time Lord God must remain abstract. If he is revealed as a sham, like the Wizard of Oz, then he is simply an ordinary man sitting in the middle of all the episode's pyrotechnics. The truth field ensures that those guessing the name of the Doctor will never acquire power over him. The Doctor should be an unknowable power, personified as 'Doctor Who?' Like Rumplestiltskin, if the Doctor is named his power is taken away from him.

The episode once again turns to Tasha Lem's voice over narrative and a montage of scenes to depict the consequences of the Doctor's attempts to protect the town and the Time Lords. The distancing effect of these voice over narratives, particularly when they are performed by a character we do not yet know, is something fellow reviewer Stuart Ian Burns astutely focuses on in his review here. This montage comes complete with comedy invisible Sontarans and children's games (another Moffat trope) with wooden Cybermen  equipped with flame throwers. How wooden Cybermen would actually work is debatable but they underline a fairy tale approach to the final, stronger half of the episode.

Here we learn that it was the Kovarian chapter of the Papal Mainframe who blew up the TARDIS and sent River Song to assassinate him and these revelations thus tidy up, without much fanfare considering their importance, the threads of continuity that have been hanging around since 2010. But that's by the by. The last 25 minutes are dominated by Matt Smith and his quietly powerful performance as an aged Doctor, a wizened sheriff facing off the terrors invading the town. As many have pointed out, the youngest actor to get the role is transformed into a little old man just as he relinquishes it to the oldest actor chosen as his replacement.

He's at the height of his powers and rescues an episode that doesn't quite find its feet until he comes hobbling out of the church and tricks a Cyberman into blowing itself up. There are lots of tiny little echoes - the Monoids in the puppet show, a mention of arm wrestling a Draconian, the drunk giraffe, the children drawing countless pictures of their hero - which reinforce the notion of the Doctor as a myth, a legend, a powerful story of 'the man who stayed for Christmas' and gave his life to keep Christmas safe in all meanings of the word. Well, we'd all wait for him, guarding his TARDIS.

And of course the name of the Doctor is hidden in plain sight. Clara, having returned from the safety of Earth after the Doctor packed her off in the TARDIS (just like he did with Rose in The Parting of the Ways), reminds the Time Lords that his name has always been 'The Doctor' when the Daleks take over the Papal Mainframe and invade the planet. Sadly, we say goodbye to Handles, a companion who stuck with the Doctor for 300 years, who never once had to dress up as a policewoman or cook a turkey but who could remember to remind the Doctor to patch the telephone into the console. Faithful unto death. 

Moffat even makes sure that the Daleks know who the Doctor is (their knowledge of him was wiped from their databanks by Clara in Asylum of the Daleks) after they harvest Tasha Lem's body and he falls into their trap aboard the Papal Mainframe. Sadly, we're back into 'Doctor insults a woman for being weak but really gets her angry' territory so he can snog her and she can destroy his enemies. The strong woman who really desires to be bowled over by a wiser father figure motif is crude at best and it's a trope that Moffat tiresomely drags out again and again. In this universe, it's either get 'feisty' women hot under the collar or ask them to undertake some self sacrifice to prove themselves.

In the end, the regeneration is a curious beast. A little whisper of golden magic dust from the crack in the wall and the Doctor gets a new life cycle (something we knew the Time Lords could grant anyway so no surprises there) and yet he proceeds to blow everything to smithereens once he's got that power.

There are a lot of contradictions in this. Generative power becomes destructive, the life affirming Doctor who fretted over the inhabitants of Christmas town lays waste to all and sundry. Peace on Earth and goodwill to all men... eh? I'm not entirely sure a regenerating Time Lord going off like a nuclear bomb is quite what Christmas town or we deserved. The image is all the more startling linked as it is to a Doctor who has spent the last 50 minutes protecting a planet from a war specifically in his name.

The intimate scenes between Clara and the ancient Doctor are to be cherished amongst the exhausted remains of the Matt Smith era, in the detritus of a particularly gaudy, cheap Christmas cracker. They are sensitively played and beautifully sum up the departure of the Eleventh Doctor.

'Eleven's hour is over now. the clock is striking twelve's' reads Clara from said cracker and change is upon us. But not before Clara has some stern words for Time Lords and reaffirms what we've all known for so long: 'It's time someone told you you've been getting it wrong. His name. His name is the Doctor. All the name he needs. Everything you need to know about him.'

'Like breath on a mirror' the Eleventh disappears from view, ruminating about how we all change through out our lives and remembering both the little Amelia that first saw him and the adult Amy that she became. 'Raggedy man... Goodnight.' It's a sweet conclusion to the reign of the Eleventh Doctor and one of the few powerfully emotional scenes in a terribly mechanical and functional affair. It's a gorgeous bauble to look at but it lacks the epic power and emotional force of nostalgia in The Day of the Doctor.

And that's that. Well, apart from Peter Capaldi grumbling about his kidneys and crashing the TARDIS. I'm not so worried about Capaldi learning 'how to fly this thing'. He'll be fine. I'm more concerned that Moffat, based on this scattershot, rambling, indulgent effort, renews his own driving licence in 2014.

DOCTOR WHO - THE BLACK ARCHIVE #62: KINDA - BACKGROUND NOTES

$
0
0


I have great pleasure to announce that my latest book The Black Archive #62: Kinda is now up for pre-order from Obverse Books. 

"‘Wheel turns, civilisations arise. Wheel turns, civilisations fall.’

With new input from writer Christopher Bailey, this archive examines how Kinda (1982) emerged from his background as a counter-cultural arts activist, a theatre and television writer, and his formative encounter with Buddhism. Searching the Dark Places of the Inside, Kinda is a richly layered allegory, inextricably linked, through the history and evolution of Buddhism’s teachings, with nineteenth-century European colonialism, fin de siècle literature, heritage cinema of the 1980s, Gauguin’s ‘noble savage’, acid trips and cutting-edge neuroscience."

I started work on this book back in December 2019, with a pitch to those good folks at Obverse Books who had published my exploration of the Season 18 story Warriors' Gate previously in May the same year. I was keen to tackle another story that I felt had several layers that could be peeled back and examined. So, I was swapping Taoism, quantum theory, Samuel Beckett and Tom Stoppard for Buddhism, Christian symbolism and Joseph Conrad (and Kate Bush). Plus drugs, primitivist painting, and the Vietnam War. Looking back at the proposal and the book that it generated I'm confident that it has managed to achieve the following broad points: 

- an examination of Kinda’s development by Christopher Bailey relative to the very different visions of script-editors Christopher Bidmead, Antony Root and Eric Saward.

- director Peter Grimwade’s approach to a story he found worked counter to the Doctor Who serial format. He saw the format’s ‘adventure story’ linearity in contradiction to Bailey’s Play for Today 'artiness', intellectualism and realism.

- coverage of the themes and symbolism of Kinda: highlighting the layering of Buddhist, Christian, shamanistic and pagan meanings in the story; the Freudian and Jungian interpretations of self and other; and the articulation and interrogation of concepts of imperialist expansion and colonialism in the story. 

Within those aims lay other questions, nuances and contexts. How do you deal with Kinda as a case study in a structuralist, media studies reading published in 1983? What on earth does the heritage television and cinema of the 1980s, science fiction feminist writer Ursula K. Le Guin and Joseph Conrad have to do with all of this? And where do T.S. Eliot and Tahiti fit into the story? Would Kinda's elusive, reclusive writer Christopher Bailey even speak to me?

By March 2020, the world was turned upside down. Although I'd started writing, my first aim was to get to BBC Written Archives and sift through the production paperwork, the writer's file and any other associated documentation to provide some foundations for the details. My April 2020 appointment was alas the victim of the pandemic shut down. My employer also put me on furlough for six months. I barely went anywhere. 

So, desk research - plowing through scripts, videos, various magazines, online newspaper archives, several books about Buddhism - took over. And, yes, Christopher Bailey did speak to me. Well, we wrote to each other, mindful of the issues that Covid-19 would add to any meeting in person, and because I understood he wanted to protect his privacy. Intermittently, for a period of two years, it began with our first conversation in September 2020 and took us to the most recent of November 2022. It provoked some interesting tangents in the book and I'm so grateful for his input.

The BBC Written Archives appointment finally came through in July 2021 but even that was fraught with difficulty. The BBC's Covid-19 policy was very stringent at the time. No one was allowed into the building unless they'd had a negative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test within 24 hours of the appointment date and time. Lateral flow tests did not cut the mustard. After a false start, where I didn't get the appropriate test result in time, I was finally able to sift through the files. The team at BBC Written Archives were very supportive as they knew how long I'd had to sit on the waiting list.

Therefore, this book also takes in the span of major, life-changing decisions and events. It was the hardest thing I've ever attempted to write. I had retired by the time I submitted the first draft in 2022. When my husband caught Covid and was also back and forth with hospital appointments for an entirely unrelated matter, I had also turned sixty as the final edits were wrestled into shape in October and November this year. One to tick off on the 'things to do when you're 60' bucket list.

So, I'll leave it there for you to judge what I've made of Kinda. Enjoy the book.

RANDALL AND HOPKIRK (DECEASED) and MAN IN A SUITCASE / Vinyl Soundtrack Albums

$
0
0
Network Distributing debuted a pair of exclusive vinyl soundtrack album releases this week. Focusing on two iconic ITC series of the late 1960s and early 1970s, Randall and Hopkirk (Deceased) and Man in A Suitcase, these beautifully designed albums assemble a number of instantly recognisable cues on high quality 180g vinyl pressed by Pallas in Germany.

Network worked with renowned vinyl cutting engineer Ray Staff, whose credits include David Bowie's The Rise and Fall of Ziggy Stardust and The Spiders From Mars and The Rolling Stones'It's Only Rock 'n' Roll, to master the albums from the FX Group tape transfers.

Ray joined the legendary Trident Studios, based in St Anne's Court, Soho, in 1970 and he became part of the fledgling Mastering Department. His skill at working on major projects with Bowie and Elton John saw him progress to become Trident’s Chief Mastering Engineer. He is currently one of the chief engineers at AIR Mastering having worked with artists as diverse as Led Zeppelin and Supertramp and most recently on the triple platinum No 1 debut album and single by Corinne Bailey Rae.


Network commented: 'Although high-quality masters were already available from the 2008 CD releases, we have returned to the original analogue tapes which have been mastered afresh for vinyl to take advantage of the format’s more subtle dynamic range. Mastering and vinyl cutting have been supervised by one of the very best in the business, ensuring that these tracks have never sounded so good since they went down onto tape in the late 1960s.'

Created by Dennis Spooner and Monty Berman, Randall and Hopkirk (Deceased)'s 26 episodes were produced and made by Scoton Productions for worldwide distribution by ITC. Their track record stretched back to some of the classic 1960s series made under the ITC banner, including The Baron (1966-67), The Champions (1968-69) and Department S (1969-70). Filming commenced in May 1968 at ABC Elstree Borehamwood, continuing into July 1969, and the series featured the crime busting antics of down at heel private investigator Jeff Randall (Mike Pratt) and his partner Marty Hopkirk (Kenneth Cope). The major selling point was that the murdered Marty was reincarnated as a ghost in the very first episode My Late Lamented Friend and Partner, transmitted in September 1969, and then 'haunted' his partner throughout the rest of the series.

Providing the music for the series was legendary composer Edwin Astley. Ted had composed the memorable themes and cues for Danger Man (1960-68), The Saint (creating two arrangements for the black and white and colour episodes between 1962 and 1969), The Baron, Department S and The Champions. Of the distinctive harpsichord dominated theme of Randall and Hopkirk (Deceased) he commented: 'It has to be something distinctive in the orchestration or in the tune and I suppose that's why I used the harpsichord because in those days it was a very distinctive sound.'(1)

He recorded a total of 188 cues for the series and the harpsichord (often used as stings to herald the appearance and disappearance of Marty and effortlessly rearranged as his signature motif), organ, high strings and high-pitched flutes and clarinets add a melancholic counterpoint (Astley's use of the minor key underlining the series' quirky notions of the afterlife) to the dynamic music, driven by strident strings, drums, brass and bass, which scores the series' action sequences.

The album features the iconic opening and end titles, the trilling notes of the harpsichord highlighting a mid-tempo jazzy waltz, and specific cues from nine episodes. They brilliantly showcase Astley's splendid sense of melody, jazz structure (the music for Money to Burn is particularly lovely) and use of motif to enhance scenes. And on vinyl they sound more organic and subtle.

The thirty one episodes of Man In A Suitcase, created by Richard Harris and Dennis Spooner under its original title of McGill, were produced in collaboration with American producer Stanley Greenberg and prolific ITC producer Sidney Cole. Filming started at Pinewood Studios in August 1966 and the series was filmed in two blocks and completed in December 1967, by which time it had been given its more familiar title. The lead role of McGill, a disgraced CIA operative taking cases on a freelance basis around the world, was given to 28 year-old Texan method actor Richard Bradford after ITC's Lew Grade saw him in Arthur Penn's The Chase (1966).

Man In A Suitcase features the work of two composers, Ron Grainer and Albert Elms. Grainer needs little introduction. A prolific television and film composer, his signature themes for Maigret (BBC, 1959-63), Steptoe and Son (BBC, 1962-74) Doctor Who (BBC, 1963-89, 1996, 2005-), The Prisoner (1967-8) and Tales of the Unexpected (ITV, 1979-88) gained him worldwide recognition. He also branched out into films, such as To Sir, With Love (1967) and The Assassination Bureau (1969), and in 1971 produced the stunning score for The Omega Man. The Grainer theme to Man In A Suitcase would gain greater recognition in its appropriation for the Chris Evans Channel 4 show TFI Friday.

Grainer's strident piano, brass and percussion driven theme anticipates his work on The Prisoner and its boldness epitomises the values of the anti-heroic central character of McGill.  In counterpoint Albert Elms offers a range of contrasting cues for eleven episodes on this album. Again, his use of lietmotif, low key woodwind, moody brass and percussion offers a taste of what was to come with his eclectic work on The Prisoner. Here, the music switches from upbeat, 1960s pop and punchy action themes, to wistful melancholia or cute jazz with Spanish and Mexican influences (often as a musical accompaniment to that week's location in the episode).

Both albums make for very nostalgic listening, as wonderful examples of music from the golden age of television, and the album artwork is beautifully handled and presented by Martin Cater. Serious vinyl collectors will get a lot of pleasure from their analogue audio fidelity and quality.

(1) Andrew Pixley, Randall and Hopkirk - Accompanying Notes 2008 CD Release

Note: these albums are only available direct from Network's site.
Randall and Hopkirk (Deceased)
Original Soundtrack Selections
Music by Edwin Astley
Network 7859033
Mono
Released: 28 October 2013

Man In A Suitcase
Original Soundtrack Selections
Music by Albert Elms
Theme by Ron Grainer
Network 7959028
Mono
Released: 28 October 2013

Although high-quality masters were already available from the CD releases, we have returned to the original analogue tapes which have been mastered afresh for vinyl to take advantage of the format’s more subtle dynamic range. Mastering and vinyl cutting have been supervised by one of the very best in the business – Ray Staff of AIR Studios – ensuring that these tracks have never sounded so good since they went down onto tape in the late 1960s. - See more at: http://networkonair.com/features/2013/10/25/the-story-behind-our-new-vinyl-releases/#sthash.9OaYXEsC.dpu

DOCTOR WHO - THE ELEVENTH HOUR: A Critical Celebration of the Matt Smith and Steven Moffat Era

$
0
0
Coming from publisher I.B. Tauris this month is another publication in the 'Who Watching' project, Doctor Who - The Eleventh Hour: A Critical Celebration of the Matt Smith and Steven Moffat Era

Edited and with an introduction from Andrew O'Day, the book is published to celebrate the Doctor's 50th anniversary and provides a valuable record of the current Matt Smith Doctor, who arrived in 2010 and is still travelling in time and space. This first book devoted solely to the Steven Moffat/Matt Smith era is written by experts on the Doctor and includes contributions from Richard Hewett, Frank Collins (that's me), Matthew Kilburn, Dee Amy-Chinn, David Budgen, Simone Knox, Jonathan Bignell, Piers D. Britton, Vasco Hexel, Matt Hills, Brigid Cherry, Neil Perryman, and Ross P. Garner.


Doctor Who - The Eleventh Hour: A Critical Celebration of the Matt Smith and Steven Moffat Era is wide-ranging and varied in viewpoint and explores such issues as the performance of the Doctor, the gothic and fairy tale genres, the portrayal of history on screen, gender and sexuality, the phenomenon of Christmas television, the transatlantic dimensions of the programme, its look and sound, promotional culture and audience response. Also discussed are Doctor Who interactive games and the spin-off The Sarah Jane Adventures. Written in accessible style, the book will be a valuable contribution to the expanding literature on Doctor Who, for fans, watchers of sci fi TV and students alike.

Andrew O'Day is co-author, with Jonathan Bignell, of Terry Nation (2004). He received his PhD in Television Studies from Royal Holloway, University of London and has contributed chapters on 'classic' and 'new Who' to a range of edited collections.

ISBN-10: 1780760191 
ISBN-13: 978-1780760193

Publication Date: 30 November 2013
Number of Pages: 288

You can now order Doctor Who - The Eleventh Hour from I.B. Tauris and Amazon


About 'Who Watching' at I.B. Tauris
"Why so many books on the Doctor at I.B.Tauris? Why the ongoing 'Who Watching' project? Well, the Doctor is central to contemporary media, and remarkably almost spans the history of television itself. Written for a receptive audience of fans and students, they have been warmly welcomed and have helped form a community, engaged in an argumentative dialogue about the history and future of the Doctor. Intelligent and loyal, with deep, deep knowledge of their field, provocative in their views, discriminating and critical too – Doctor Who fans keep us on our toes to publish the best writing on and thinking about this extraordinary phenomenon."

Check out the 'Who Watching' website for reviews of the current series and articles from authors in their published range on many aspects of classic and current Doctor Who.  

SCHALCKEN THE PAINTER - BFI Flipside Dual Format Edition / Review

$
0
0
Leslie Megahey's extraordinary television film Schalcken the Painter finally arrives on Blu-Ray and DVD this month courtesy of the BFI. As with many of the home entertainment releases in their Gothic: The Dark Heart of Film season, Schalcken the Painter has such a reputation it has been on the 'most wanted' lists of many fans of British telefantasy for decades. Here it is and remastered in high definition from the 16mm interpositive held in the BFI Archive and released in the Flipside range of obscure British films.

Writer, director and producer Megahey's career began in BBC radio where, after he graduated from his traineeship, he wrote and produced radio plays for a year. He joined the BBC's Music and Arts department and in 1967, along with other television trainees Tony Palmer, Alan Yentob and Nigel Williams, began making films about painters and writers under the auspices of pioneering television executive Stephen Hearst.

Megahey was as much an inspirational figure himself as Yentob, then a raw recruit, professed: 'Leslie was a little older than me and had arrived at the BBC by much the same route two years earlier. We became close friends and colleagues in the Music and Arts department of the BBC. Leslie's enthusiasm and commitment were infectious. Leslie was endlessly curious and was a great believer in finding inventive ways to tell stories.'(1)


It was this inventiveness Megahey brought to the drama-documentary form. His first full length film about a painter, The Performers (BBC, 1972), an exploration of the astonishing twists and turns of Goya's life, was produced under the editorship of Nigel Williams for Omnibus (BBC, 1967-2003) and it ushered in his signature use of dramatising scenes of the artist's work and a distanced narrator for what where technically documentary biographies.

In this way he was following a direct line from director Ken Russell (whom Megahey described as 'a true innovator') and his work, both for Omnibus and its predecessor Monitor, on Elgar (BBC 1962), The Debussy Film (BBC, 1965) and Song of Summer (BBC, 1968). During the 1970s Megahey continued to make 'personal essay films, where the dramatised parts evoked ideas and obsessions about the artist's work' covering such subjects as John Donne, Ligeti, Rodin and Gaugin. (2)
'brooding, sexy and gothic - and based in some kind of art historical reality'
Schalcken the Painter, made in 1979, came about in a rather circuitous way. Megahey's editor Paul Humfress, who had worked with him on a number of films, picked up a collection of short stories by J Sheridan Le Fanu in a second hand shop in Amsterdam and immediately thought one story, first published in The Dublin University Magazine in 1839 as 'Strange Event in the Life of Schalken the Painter: Being a Seventh Extract from the Legacy of the Late Francis Purcell, P.P. of Drumcoolagh' and later in a revised form 'Schalken the Painter' (sic) for inclusion in 1851's Ghost Stories and Tales of Mystery, was perhaps the property they were looking for.

Megahey and Humfress had wanted to make something 'brooding, sexy and gothic - and based in some kind of art historical reality' and Le Fanu's story, re-typed by Humfress and submitted to Megahey for his approval, fitted the bill. (3) He then researched 17th Century Dutch painting by visiting the Rijksbureau voor Kunsthistorische Documentatie at The Hague. In the collections archive, he examined the documented work of Godfried Schalcken, the genre and portrait painter who was the inspiration for Le Fanu's story.

Schalcken was notable for representing scenes by candlelight and a number of paintings paralleled many of the scenes Megahey had incorporated into his own script: 'I was amazed at how prolific he was having never heard of him before. So the extra scenes, and the brothel incidents, were based on the Schalckens I had seen in Holland and on the images of deHooch and other painters.'(4) One painting - a girl holding a candle while in the background a man draws a sword - remained elusive, presumed destroyed. A mock-up was used in the finished film. 

After showing a hand written screenplay, completed in the course of one night, to drama director Tristram Powell he was advised to add more dialogue and dramatisation, After struggling to expand the script when in reality he had no mind to, Megahey devised the opening, off screen introduction to the film where Schalcken poses his model and asks her rather ominously to 'look into the dark'. 

In August 1976, he asked the acting Head of Music and Arts Norman Swallow to look at the script as 'an interesting offer from our department as a Christmas ghost story with a serious leaning towards the arts. It's a very unusual way to deal with the psyche of the artist and the conflicts between art and life.' Even at this stage, Megahey was thinking of raising co-production money from the Dutch Public Broadcasting company, Nos and sending the script to Vincent Price, asking him to play Le Fanu as the narrator. (5)

Offering it to director Lawrence Gordon Clark, who had been responsible for the superb M.R. James adaptations in A Ghost Story for Christmas since 1971, was mooted but Megahey was rather protective of the project, feeling he wanted to direct it himself. A commission was not forthcoming and the film remained unmade until Megahey became series editor of the Omnibus strand, taking over from Barry Gavin, and he could in effect commission himself. The opportunity therefore arose to make Schalcken the Painter with co-production finance from Rainer Moritz. This was serendipitous as the television BBC ghost story tradition could said to have begun with Omnibus and Jonathan Miller's Whistle and I'll Come to You in 1968.

The idea of casting Vincent Price was quickly abandoned when Megahey decided the notion of an on screen narrator would not work and especially so when Price's qualities as an actor might 'tip an entire film over in the wrong direction'. Megahey also has vague memories of the script being rejected by Peter Cushing who 'objected to the script, I think, probably on moral grounds.'(6)

Instead, the silky voiced charms of Charles Gray provided the framing voice over narrative, with the Le Fanu fiction delivered as both commentary and constructed fiction around real people and actual paintings. The opening sequence, of the painter Schalcken (Jeremy Clyde) hard at work on a portrait, flashes back to his apprenticeship with his master Gerrit Dou (Maurice Denham in a role originally considered for Arthur Lowe) and his pathetic attempts to woo the old man's niece and ward, Rose Velderkaust (Cheryl Kennedy).

A strange, chilling story unfolds in which the corruptible and miserly Dou sells off his niece to the ghoulish but aristocratic figure of Vanderhausen (John Justin) and Schalcken, in his fruitless attempt to find her, turns to prostitution - not only for sexual gratification but also for the commercial realisation of his art.

Justin had worked with Megahey on radio and was part of a small repertory company of supporting actors the director regularly used. Jeremy Clyde was cast because he bore an uncanny resemblance to the Schalcken self portraits and Cheryl Kennedy embodied not just the 'creamy looks of a Vermeer model' but also Rose's fierce intelligence. (7)

The low budget production was confined to several small sets, replications of exteriors made in studio and the brothel interior, and one large set for the interior of Dou's house. Megahey's core team comprised of editor Paul Humfress, lighting cameraman John Hooper and designer Anna Ridley. All three had previously worked on Megahey's films.

Ridley worked closely with Megahey and Hooper to recreate the signature look of Dutch paintings, particularly Vermeer and Rembrandt. Hooper lit the sets with miniature spot lights, opted for large areas of the frame to tail off into inky blackness and pushed the exposures to encompass candlelight and subtle colours. 'A most important design feature of the shooting was the lining up of doors within doors. While we were on the set we pinned up a lot of repros of Dutch paintings on a board to refer to while lighting and shooting,' Megahey recalled and he also strove to capture a certain authenticity in the sequences where Schalcken was painting. (8) Ridley employed an art consultant, Paul Martin, to advise on the recreation and production of many of the paintings in the film.

It's certainly amise-en-scene - artist biography, precise use of props, lighting, a documentary realism coupled with stillness and carefully choreographed camera moves - that reflected Derek Jarman's work on The Tempest (1979) and anticipated the same director's Caravaggio (1986) and the postmodern formula of Peter Greenaway's The Draughtsman's Contract (1982) wherein both films are full of references to paintings, use of tableaux and symbolic objects. Megahey also offers, in the documentary, that Walerian Borowczyk's Blanche (1971) was a thematic and stylistic influence on the shooting of the film.
'... allegories warning the viewer to take care to live a life of virtue and realise your immortal soul will have more weight than your possessions'
Schalcken the Painter opens with a close up of a burning candle, used within Dutch painting of the period as a symbol our time is brief and life is short and as a repeating, foreboding emblem in the film, before the camera pans up to a woman posing and reaching up to a drapery for the off screen Schalcken. She is directed to look into the dark.

The image is reproduced again when the narrator asks us to consider a particular painting, one of a woman holding a candle before such a drapery while a man draws a sword in the background. Some terrible shape also lurks in the darkness behind the coquettishly smiling woman. The image of drapery unveiling something uncanny and unpleasant in the shadows reoccurs in the film.

We are taken back to Gerrit Dou's studio in 1665, during Schalcken's apprenticeship, to understand the terrible significance of this painting. In Dou's house, Megahey crams in as many references as he can, often opulent tableaux, to underline the film's themes and the allusions to art of the period - the goods of exchange, consumerism, commodification and the price of everything and anyone.

Game birds, hanging rabbits and dried flowers slowly move out of frame as the camera replicates the perspective of Vermeer's 'Woman Holding A Balance'. We see Gerrit Dou counting his money. It acknowledges a genre of painting, which depicted various civilians counting money or weighing gold, presented as allegories warning the viewer to take care to live a life of virtue and realise your immortal soul will ultimately have more weight than your possessions. It summarises the theme of Schacklen the Painter perfectly.

Right from the opening scene Megahey is preoccupied with commerce and the notion that everything, including sex and death, is up for sale in Schalcken's world. The image of the balance is repeated when Schalcken takes Vanderhausen's box of gold coins to be valued before Dou accepts it as payment for his niece and, again, when Schalcken poses a woman with a balance holding a dead bird and jewellery for one of his paintings.

The notion of value, of the real Gerrit Dou's 'real respect for money' and the aggrandising of art and money over 'the transports of love' are present and correct in Le Fanu's original story. As Simon Schama noted, seventeenth-century Dutch painters insisted on reminding those whom appreciated their work wealth was transitory and death and God's final judgment were ever looming and materiality was fleeting when compared to divine salvation or damnation. (9)

Rose is of course the antithesis of this very male, moneyed world. We first see her revealed by a gentle pan across the studio and caught in a faithfully mounted reproduction of Vermeer's 'Young Woman Standing at a Virginal' playing a refrain on the keyboard. Music was one of the most popular themes in Dutch painting and carried many diverse associations. In portraits, a musical instrument or songbook might suggest the education or social position of the sitter and refer to the idea of faithfulness to one lover or, in conjunction with the virginal, to the traditional association of music and love.

It is the scene of Schalcken's first fumbling attempts at courtship and one repeated in Megahey's nod to Vermeer's 'The Kitchen Maid' as Rose virtuously carries out her household duties as Schalcken dithers at her side. In one of these moments of 'courtship' Schalcken cradles Rose's breast. Again, Megahey mirrors this encounter in the unsettling conclusion to the film where Schalcken is reunited with Rose. Before she forces upon him the ultimate humiliation there is a brief, ironic moment where she cradles her own breast.

Damnation is the course that both Gerrit Dou and his pupil Schalcken are set upon (many shots contain a skull as a visual reminder of their fate). Dou's greed knows no bounds and he eventually sells his pretty ward to Vanderhausen, the Death figure who drops in for dinner and demands her as his concubine. Le Fanu's tale then inverts Schalcken's fate. He becomes as in demand as his old master and just as corruptible.

At first unrequited in love and then plagued with guilt when he fails to rescue Rose from the clutches of Vanderhausen, he finds solace in the beds of prostitutes. That reversal of fortune aligns Schalcken not only with his greedy master but also with the figure of Death personified by Vanderhausen. The realisation is 'The old possess money and power and the right to dispose of the young as they see fit, the most powerful being the oldest and wealthiest and, in fact, dead'. (10)

Megahey achieves this not through Sturm und Drang but by subtle degree. The interior of the studio, the exercise of painting and the awkward courting between Schalcken and Rose seek to domesticate the Gothic. The camera is often static or very slowly panning or tracking in contrast to the continual movement of figures through doorways and in and out of rooms. Gradually, unease is generated.

When Rose is lost to the predations of the deathly Vanderhausen, Schalcken uses the creation of her portrait as a form of exorcism, 'an attempt to distance and interpret a dream' just as Le Fanu's narrator reinterprets it for the reader and viewer. (11) There's an amusing scene where Dou is instructing his students and posing his models for a tableaux of 'The Temptation of Saint Anthony'. After identifying an old man and a luscious young woman as the titular saint and his nemesis, he casually instructs his pupils, 'devils, you will imagine the devils'.

Indeed, as a result Schalcken conjures up the haunted figure of Vanderhausen. A brilliant, subtle shot shows Schalcken at work on his painting of Anthony. It is not going well and upon the cry of 'Damn the picture, damn the devils and the saints. Damn the lot of them to hell' a slow camera pan to the left of the screen reveals the spectre literally sitting at the shoulder of the artist and emerging from the gloom behind him.

At the tolling of a bell, the strike of a clock and the creak of a floorboard Vanderhausen demands an audience with Dou. Sound and music is used very creatively in the film. The scratching of pens on parchment and charcoal on canvas, the chiming of clocks, cutlery scraping on plates and busy footsteps provide a domestic soundscape which is then augmented by an ominous, rising bass note to signal the impending appearance of the demonic lover Vanderhausen.

The Gothic and the uncanny are thus rendered through visual composition dominated by shadow and candlelight, the recreation not just of Dutch painting but in the studio mounted moonlit canals of Rotterdam, and the combination of natural sounds and discordant musical tones.

Megahey takes his cue from Le Fanu and sets out to disjoint reality and our expectations of the ghost story on television, as noted by Simon Cooke: 'Le Fanu’s light and dark is a symbolic exemplification of the uncertainties of reality, a frightening space where nothing is fixed, and Megahey creates a strong visual equivalent which preserves the story’s sense of ‘ill-defined' menace and strangeness.'(12)

This is matched by Megahey's own playfulness with narrative and documentary techniques describing the lives of artists, their milieu and the power of the personal commission. The personal commission comes in all forms - the selling of portraiture and the selling of the living to the dead.

Rose becomes the 'object of our contract' according to Vanderhausen. She, Dou and Schalcken lose their appetite when they finally cast their eyes upon the gaunt visage of her husband to be, the 'very rich friend' for whom she 'must trick her self out handsomely', at their gloomy, candlelit dinner.

John Hooper's control of lighting in this scene is quite stunning with the dinner table and diners marooned in inky blackness save for the guttering candlelight. When Vanderhausen takes his seat, his ornate coat glistens wetly and he looks as if freshly emerged, rotting, from one of the canals. There are glimpses of his pale, drawn face, alluding back to the many skulls placed within the working space of the artists' studio, framed between glowing candles as food is served and left untouched. The skull, which Megahey places in many scenes throughout the film, quotes Pieter Claesz's painting 'Vanitas' and its reminder of the certainty of death.

The dinner ends with the narrator simply underlining Dou's 'heartlessness' at binding his niece to this creature. The real tragedy is Schalcken's fecklessness as Rose urges a plan upon him to elope before she is contracted to Vanderhausen. All he can offer is paint and canvas as a way of saving money to buy out the contract but, more truthfully, 'Schalcken, with at least one foot inside the establishment pale, cannot directly confront the horror that haunts him, perhaps because he is implicated in it. He can paint it only indirectly as part of his attempt to minimize his own guilt and failure.'(13)

And so Rose departs and leaves behind her shoes. Like a quasi-Cinderella figure, with her Prince Charming rather slow off the mark, she succumbs to the deathly sexuality of Vanderhausen. E. de Jong, one of the leading Dutch specialists in symbolism, regards these so-called pantoffel, shoes without backs, as one of the top ten erotic symbols in Dutch painting of the seventeenth century.

The scene reflects such paintings as 'The Slippers', by van Hoogstraten, which was an allegory of lust and temptation. The missing Rose is later the object of the unfaithful Schalcken's search in Rotterdam but his distraction by the alluring delights of a brothel, the temptations of the flesh, emphasises the images of women as commercial sex objects. They also capture the visual intensity of Schalcken's own paintings of women by candlelight.
‘the dead and the living cannot be one’
In one of the film's most disturbing scenes, Rose reappears many months later as a haunted figure seeking sanctuary from Dou and Schalcken. It's very noticeable how her terror, at the imminent arrival of Vanderhausen to claim her back, briefly shifts the rhythm of the film. The slow pace is replaced by swift camera moves and a crane shot, breaking the dominance of horizontal camera moves with an emphatic vertical, as she takes refuge in a bedroom before being snatched away again by her demon lover.

There is a brooding intensity to the scene and Rose's claim of ‘the dead and the living cannot be one’ not only highlights the tale's Gothic trappings but also signifies that creativity and emotion, her musicality and Schalcken's talent, cannot be wedded to the dead hand of commerce and its moral bankruptcy. Rose's terror, her emotional state, momentarily disrupts an all male, dispassionate milieu which is 'possessed and animated by the spirit of avarice'. (14)

There is a sense, after Schalcken is terrified by a vision of the dead Rose making love to Vanderhausen in the crypt of St. Laurence's church at the end of the film, that the tables are turned. Incidentally, the church is referred to several times - Rose recognises Vanderhausen from a tomb effigy after previously visiting the church; Schalcken meets a coach driver who brought her and Vanderhausen to the church - and is codified as the ultimate Gothic space. Here death and sex merge together.

Schalcken is seduced into entering the crypt by the vision of Rose only to find himself unable to escape the hellish act of debauchery she subjects him to. When he offers her money and she tips his purse onto the floor, Rose underlines 'the power of wealth over love... reducing Schalken to the status of a client who failed to pay enough, or, perhaps, a pimp who sold his ‘love’ for the greatest profit.'(15)

Rose has discovered the 'marriage bed' is as cold as a tomb and in the final scene her and Vanderhausen's lovemaking in the crypt is a translation of Dou's equally claustrophobic, emotionally empty, dark house. It is also the trigger for Schalcken to project his guilt into the painting we see him feverishly completing in the pre-titles sequence and later in another flash forwards. After tantalising him with the goods he has so longed for and reduced him to failed rescuer and rejected lover, Schalcken attempts to redress the balance. The figure with the drawn sword is a vain attempt to paint himself as 'hero' perhaps. Le Fanu's interlacing narrative folds inwards.

Megahey's film both embraces the television ghost story and almost elevates it to documentary. Le Fanu's fiction and Megahey's production weave between a treatise on Dutch painting and a Gothic chiller, entwining the Gothic tale within the reception of a television arts documentary strand and evoking Freud's notion of the 'uncanny' in the traditions of art history and the deeper symbolism of Dutch painting.

(1) Sarah Brown, Moving On Up
(2) Phil Tonge, interview with Leslie Megahey, 'Look into the dark' in Creeping Flesh: The Horror Fantasy Film Book Vol.2.
(3) and (4) Ibid
(5) Interview with Leslie Megahey, 'Look into the Dark' on Schalcken the Painter BFI DVD
(6) Ibid
(7) Phil Tonge, interview with Leslie Megahey, 'Look into the dark' in Creeping Flesh: The Horror Fantasy Film Book Vol.2.
(8) Ibid
(9) James Swafford, 'Tradition and Guilt in Le Fanu's "Schalken the Painter"', The Canadian Journal of Irish Studies, Vol. 14, No. 2
(10) Ibid
(11) Ibid
(12) Simon Cooke, 'The Demon in the House: Le Fanu at the British Broadcasting Corporation' in Le Fanu Studies 3. 2008. No. 2
(13) James Swafford, 'Tradition and Guilt in Le Fanu's "Schalken the Painter"', The Canadian Journal of Irish Studies, Vol. 14, No. 2
(14) Simon Cooke, 'The Demon in the House: Le Fanu at the British Broadcasting Corporation' in Le Fanu Studies 3. 2008. No. 2
(15) Ibid


About the transfer
Grain is abundant but that is hardly surprising as this is transfered from a 16mm interpositive. There are occasional flecks of dirt but overall this is a very welcome presentation after years of looking at very murky, fuzzy bootleg copies of the film. Even though the image is soft, the clarity of this remaster yields up details in the sets, props, costumes and faces and the subtleties of Hooper's cinematography. This is seen particularly in the red and green colour washes gently bathing key scenes and his effective use of candlelight. The contrast, along with the grain, gives this a thick texture and for the most part it is fairly robust and provides the appropriate levels of blackness. Don't expect this to pop off the screen but do relish the opportunity to 'look into the dark' at last and see the details of a handsome looking film. Sound is crisp and clear with little hiss and other discrepancies such as clicks. 

Special features
The Pit(Edward Abraham, 1962, 27 mins)
An experimental gothic short, adapted from Edgar Allen Poe’s ‘The Pit and the Pendulum', The Pit is a powerful visual poem without dialogue. It does remain quite faithful to Poe's original although the ending is darker and nastier. Gregory Lawson's design is very strong and the film is dominated by a superb use of sound.  
Original sketches for The Pit
The Pledge (Digby Rumsey, 1982, 21 mins)
Three criminals pledge to free the soul of their friend from his gibbeted corpse in this short film. One of a series of short films shot by Digby Rumsey and based on 'The Highwayman' by noted Irish 'Weird Fiction' writer Lord Dunsany. The BFI describes it thus: 'At the heart of this evocative tale is a gloriously well-realised corpse, creakily dangling from the gallows. As the highwayman's sinful life is slowly revealed, the jarring contrast between the stillness of death and the bawdy rigour of life is vividly reflected'. An interview with Digby Rumsey can be found at Celluloid Wickerman.
Look Into the Dark (2013, 39 mins)
A significant interview with director/producer/writer Leslie Megahey and director of photography John Hooper about the development and production of Schalcken the Painter. Megahey discusses the original script, raising the funding and the themes and ideas in the film. Hooper discusses the use of chiaroscuro lighting and the influence of Dutch paintings on the look of the film.
Illustrated booklet
With new essays by Ben Hervey, James Bell and Vic Pratt

Schalcken the Painter
BBC 1979
Transmitted 23rd December 1979
BFI Flipside Cat. No 028 / Cat No. BFIB1184 / Cert 15 / Colour / English language with optional hard of hearing subtitles / 70 mins / Original aspect ratio 1.33:1 
Disc 1: BD50 / 1080p / 24fps / PCM mono audio (48k/16-bit)
Disc 2: DVD9 / PAL / Dolby Digital mono audio (320kbps)

AN ADVENTURE IN SPACE AND TIME / Review

$
0
0
An Adventure in Space and Time
BBC Two HD
21 November 2013, 9.00pm

Three moments in real and fictional time blend and merge in the opening scene of Mark Gatiss's superb drama An Adventure in Space and Time when a car pulls up in front of a police box on a fog enshrouded Barnes Common. Immediately, associations spring into your mind or, at the very least, into the minds of many long in the tooth Doctor Who fans. Gatiss has already prepared the way with a retro BBC globe, an announcer quoting The Aztecs and telling us that truth and fiction are mutable companions in the retelling of Doctor Who's creation: 'It is important to remember however that you can't rewrite history. Not one line. Except perhaps when you embark on an adventure in space and time.'


A car accident on foggy Barnes Common opened David Whittaker's radical reinterpretation of Ian and Barbara's first encounter with the Doctor and his TARDIS in his novelisation Doctor Who and the Daleks; the writer of An Unearthly Child, Anthony Coburn, was walking on Wimbledon Common and allegedly thought its resident police box would be a good visual representation for the TARDIS; in the televised version of An Unearthly Child a policeman patrols the gates of I.M. Foreman's junkyard before a camera drives through the fog, through the gates, for a big close up of the now iconic police box. In 1966, actor William Hartnell (David Bradley) sits in his car, haunted and preoccupied, as a policeman comes out of the police box and approaches Hartnell's parked car.

For Hartnell it seems there is nothing at the end of the lane. 'You need to move along now, sir. Sir, you're in the way,' advises the policeman, Gatiss's dialogue already ironically underpinning the melancholy Hartnell's own feelings as he comes to terms with his departure from a successful  television series he has made his own and his imminent replacement by another actor.
'pop-pop-pop'
The opening scene cuts back to Hartnell's dressing room as the irascible actor is coaxed out of his reverie to record his final scenes for The Tenth Planet. Director Terry McDonough very powerful asserts the Proustian rush of Gatiss's bittersweet and witty script through controlled visuals: a 1966 Cyberman looming in close up before incongruously taking a drag on his cigarette; Hartnell, transformed into the Doctor, emerging into a breathtaking point of view shot of the TARDIS interior in the studio.

These are wonderfully engineered moments. The swoop across the TARDIS console in the studio is given a little frisson by having the interior sound effects, which would have been put onto the soundtrack of Doctor Who episodes in post production, weave into the mise-en-scène like a tangible memory, as if the TARDIS set came complete with those strange sounds.

Hartnell gazes upwards, his eyes close, and memories are evoked. McDonough even takes a cue from original director Waris Hussein's use of the dissolve in An Unearthly Child. Just as the close up of the TARDIS in the junk yard whisks us away to the corridor of Coal Hill School or Ian and Barbara recall their strange pupil Susan Foreman in flashback while sitting in their car, Hartnell and the year-o-meter on the console plunge us back to 1963.

In effect the TARDIS console becomes the repository of Hartnell's fading memories and failing faculties. Not only does it hurtle the viewer to 1963 and plunge us forward through the peaks and troughs of the Hartnell era, with the arrivals and departures of cast and crew, but its faulty time rotor, which it seems only Hartnell has the knack to properly switch on, also provides a visual allusion to the debilitating effects of the show's punishing schedule and the diagnosis of arteriosclerosis that would eventually see him step down from the role.

Once we're back in 1963, McDonough and Gatiss switch their focus to the BBC and the charismatic figure of Sydney Newman. Brian Cox provides an appropriately larger-than-life performance as Newman ('the clue's in the name'), clearly a showman at heart and willing to take risks and gamble with populist ideas ('pop-pop-pop'). His previous credentials with series such as the Pathfinders trilogy and The Avengers are given a nostalgic mention and he's the embodiment of the ITV new broom sweeping through the confusing corridors of TV Centre.

A go-getting individual, on the look out for people with 'piss and vinegar in their veins', Newman is working in a corporation still trying to throw off the shackles of the post war period and deal with the threat of commercial television. These attitudes are exemplified by Harry the commissioner (a sweet cameo from William Russell) demanding Newman's pass and being refused ('that's not the way we do things at the BBC, sir!) and the later scene in the BBC bar where director Waris Hussein (Sacha Dhawan) runs into institutional racism after trying to order a drink from an ignorant bar man (a briefly glimpsed Toby Hadoke).

Hussein is also the object of some derision during a tense recording session at the poorly resourced Lime Grove Studio D. Hartnell's own attitudes to the Asian director are deftly touched upon in a meeting he has with Hussein and producer Verity Lambert (Jessica Raine) in a Chinese restaurant which shows how Hartnell was as much a creature of his time as the old guard at the BBC were.

His treatment of the waiter serving him is a reminder that he was a man of his time but as Hussein recently commented in Manchester last week he struggled to deal with situations and people he didn't understand. It's touching that, later in the film, Hartnell is seen struggling with change and painful goodbyes and how he really missed Hussein's presence in the studio. 

The future is represented by the stunning images of Television Centre. The building is another character in the film and McDonough, with a poignant eye on its recent closure, suitably frames the likes of Newman and Lambert with some very glamourous, wide angle images of the building, its central rotunda reflecting the glass time rotor of the TARDIS console and with both connoting the future ahead. The birth of the so-called 'golden age' of the BBC and Doctor Who is about to go into full swing in McDonough's film just as the filming of An Adventure in Space and Time was the last drama ever filmed in that iconic White City television factory.

Mervyn Pinfield (Jeff Rawle) and Rex Tucker (Andrew Woodall) are charged with bringing Newman's idea for a new tea time show to fruition. Both are faced with the promotion of a former production assistant, Verity Lambert, to the role of producer on the show, now called Doctor Who. Lambert is introduced, along with actress Jacqueline Hill (Jemma Powell), during a party where their ambitions for the future coincide with the inspiring and courageous achievements of 26 year-old Valentina Tereshkova, the first woman in space.

Lambert and Hill are clearly representative of a generation of women hungry for independence and successful careers and it's quite ironic that before Lambert changes a channel to watch news of Tereshkova on television, a brief sequence from the BBC's glamourous soap opera about a glossy women's magazine, Compact, pops up on the screen. Television was the future as was Tereshkova's flight into space. Later, we see Lambert framed on a television screen as she chats to associate producer Pinfield and he pleads with her to add some 'warm beer' to her 'piss and vinegar' attitude. Rawle is particularly good in this scene and I love the fact that Gatiss got Pinfield's credit for inventing the teleprompter into the scene too.

Television and television production dominate the drama. Hartnell's depression about his career and his grumpy tirade to his granddaughter is framed by a recreation of his appearance in The Army Game. He's tired of playing 'crooks and perishing sergeant majors' but his wife Heather (Lesley Manville) cannily observes that he's seen as an authority figure, the very thing Sydney Newman is looking for in the Doctor. He strives to be 'a legitimate character actor' (dialogue mirroring the recently recovered Points West interview with Hartnell) and, as actor David Bradley noted in a recent BBC Breakfast interview, Hartnell was a man haunted by his own illegitimacy and background.

Even Newman describes his Doctor Who concept as 'legitimate stuff' so it's understandable why Hartnell was abrasive and found the challenge of playing 'Doctor Who' a rather daunting one. Hartnell's cruel attack on granddaughter Judith therefore ushers in another major theme. The man is obviously uncomfortable with the presence of children and finds it difficult to relate to them. Bradley's face is a picture when Manville, as Hartnell's wife Heather, tells the old curmudgeon he's been asked to star in a show for 'kiddies'.

Hartnell's casting as the Doctor transforms his persona when he becomes, as Verity promises him, a combination of 'H.G. Wells and Father Christmas' and huge favourite to children everywhere. The magic of Doctor Whois crystalised in a later scene, as Hartnell tries to learn his lines and, explaining to his granddaughter about the story, he gradually repairs their uneasy relationship by telling her about the Doctor - 'a funny old man who lives inside a magic box'. 'Does he make people better?' asks Judith. Hartnell ponders. The viewer emphatically knows the answer. Again, this is underlined where he meets his child audience while sitting in the park as Heather reads letters from young viewers. Thus the drama demonstrates how Hartnell became inseparable from the role and was offered a new lease of life as an actor.
'... quickly child, we're running out of time. Check the fornicator!'
His meeting with Hussein and Lambert in the Chinese restaurant concludes with a gorgeous riff on that old in-joke. 'Doctor... Who?' asks Hartnell as he grasps his lapels in that distinctive manner after Lambert and Hussein butter him up and persuade him to consider the part. Sacha Dhawan is uncannily similar to the young Hussein and works particularly well with Bradley and Raine to portray the strong relationships which coalesced between producer, director and leading man.

When Hussein first meets Lambert, Gatiss pays off the earlier visual nod to Compact. Lambert dampens the aspiring director's criticism of 'cavemen and Doctors and disappearing bloody police boxes' when she discovers his last job was directing the BBC soap opera. 'High art, indeed', she wryly comments. Their bond is beautifully presented and Lambert sees Hussein, a gay Indian director, as a recruit in her assault against the old guard at the BBC or, as she puts it, 'this... sea of fag smoke, tweed and sweaty men.'

As Mark Gatiss points out via Lambert in the script, so many people were in on the creation of Doctor Who'we could be here all day'. So only in passing do we see Delia Derbyshire rushing down a Maida Vale corridor with her tape loops as she constructs her arrangement of Ron Grainer's theme and tells us how Brian Hodgson's front door key scraping against piano string became the TARDIS sound effect.

Similarly, we only get a glimpse of Mervyn Pinfield supervising the creation of the equally iconic 'howl-around' opening titles. They may only be fragmentary footnotes in the bigger story about Hartnell's transformation into the Doctor but they're precious, perfectly formed nuggets.

A similar treatment is applied to Jacqueline Hill, William Russell (Jamie Glover) and Carole Ann Ford (Claudia Grant). They arrive as support to Hartnell and only have a few key scenes but, as Hill raises her glass at the press conference to announce the show and proclaims 'goodbye, real world', we plunge with them into the making of the pilot of An Unearthly Child (or 100,000 BC or The Tribe of Gum if that takes your fancy).

Through rehearsals, where Lambert learns the art of keeping her leading man on side, to the chaotic recording, An Adventure in Space and Time recreates familiar moments such as Ian and Barbara's first encounter with the Doctor and their stumble into the TARDIS.

In tandem, Lambert develops a no nonsense attitude particularly toward Peter Brachacki, who designed the TARDIS interior. As he hurriedly assembles a random selection of punched out cardboard and cotton reels, McDonough's camera looks down overhead and there's a delicious dissolve into an another overhead shot of the fully realised, beautifully recreated TARDIS set, where we go 'through the cupboad doors and into Narnia'.

Fantasy, magic, fairy tale all roll into one but reality is not far away as AFM Douglas Camfield struggles to persuade an actor to get his teeth blacked up as one of the cavemen featured in the cliffhanger to the pilot. Sand fleas in Y-fronts, uncontrollable TARDIS doors, awkward cameras moving like tanks, Billy-fluffs and over sensitive sprinklers make up the catalogue of disasters delightfully captured here.

Despite Newman's serious doubts about the pilot, Doctor Who gets another chance. The pilot is re-recorded and production continues. Lambert acknowledges Hartnell's criticisms of the role are spot on and in a lovely scene she is seen privately chatting to him, understands his insecurities and convinces him he is still the right man for the part. Again, Bradley seems to tap into the emotional turmoil inside Hartnell, sensitively essaying the man's fear of failure.

Onward then, despite the demand from Head of Television Donald Baverstock (a cameo from Mark Eden, star of Marco Polo) Doctor Who should end after the completion of the episodes then in production, to the introduction of the Daleks. McDonough's visual inventiveness knows no bounds. As Newman reads Terry Nation's script and his description of the Daleks, 'hideous machine like creatures... a lens on a flexible shaft', McDonough cross-cuts to Lee Harvey Oswald priming his Carcarno rifle and telescopic sight in the book depository overlooking Dealey Plaza in Dallas.

Two anniversaries collide here. The killing machines of Skaro are equated with the terrible slaughter of Kennedy, a mass media president at the heart of the civil rights movement, the Cuban missile crisis and the space programme. A man of the future exterminated perhaps out of a fear for what kind of future he might usher in. An interesting connection is formed between Kennedy and the survivors of a nuclear war on a distant, alien planet whose xenophobia translates into racial purity and hatred of the other.

Lambert vehemently defends her decision to tell the story of the Daleks which Newman sees merely as 'the cheap-jack science fiction trash' he wanted her to avoid. Her view of the Daleks as creatures 'who lash out' out of fear could also be seen as a parallel with Hartnell's own search for inner peace in the story, especially as illness forces him back into his own protective shell. This is echoed later when Hartnell, suffering terribly from his illness, hears his inner self-doubt and fear realised in the form of Dalek voices. It's a very clever touch.

Without the Daleks, the series may never have continued. The iconic design still captivates us and the recreation of The Daleks (or The Mutants as it was known) in studio is wonderful. The Dalek props look fantastic and our first view is an inventive shot taken from inside the prop as one of the operators is prepared for recording and we see intrigued bystanders through the mesh of the neck section. As recording in the studio proceeds, on the soundtrack we hear the distinctive electronic tonalities created by Tristram Carey overlaid in an another example of music and sound effects reinvented as ghosts to haunt the scene. And there in the corner of the studio is Nick Briggs playing Peter Hawkins, the Dalek voice of the present overlaid onto a figure from Doctor Who history. History in the making.

McDonough and Gatiss consider the impact of the Daleks upon the British public too. Out in the street, a mother calls her children inside for tea and Doctor Who and McDonough's camera glides over to a window and peers in as a family watch the Daleks on television. Lambert witnesses several schoolboys imitating the Daleks on the upper deck of a bus. Later, along come the Dalek play suits and the annuals as the show cements its popularity and casts its magic spell.

Newman admits he was wrong after 10 million tune in and it seems Doctor Who's success is assured. Hartnell becomes more and more identified with the role, his mistakes with dialogue accepted as part of the Doctor's eccentric character. Behind it all however is the terrible spectre of his illness and, with it, a rapidly failing memory. Amusing as his slips may be to begin with ('quickly child, we're running out of time. Check the fornicator!'), Bradley's subtle performance shows the strain and worry behind Hartnell's face. It's achingly sad.

That ache is also there when Hussein departs the production after Marco Polo, presented in another lovely recreation of the studio sets. As William Russell says in a moment of foreshadowing, 'no one knows how long this is going to last. No one's irreplaceable'. Hussein and Lambert go their separate ways and gradually Hartnell finds the company around him changing and diminishing. Another actor, another Doctor once said, 'A man is the sum of his memories you know, a Time Lord even more so...' and Hartnell's sense of security is 'whittled away, piece by piece' by long schedules, changes to cast and crew and the struggle to cope with his illness.
'especially effective in recalibrating Hartnell's contribution to the series'
Nowhere is this better demonstrated than in the recreation of The Dalek Invasion of Earth. After an astonishing remounting of the Daleks gliding across Westminster Bridge, hilariously brought to a halt because one of the Dalek operators demands to have a wee, Hartnell is faced with the departure of Carole Ann Ford. Clearly upset by her departure, he lashes out at a fellow actor's suggestion for the next scene.

The recording of the Doctor's speech to the abandoned Susan is captured in a sublime amalgam of gorgeous studio recreation and Bradley's stunning performance. You get a real sense of Hartnell's own sadness at Ford's departure in a moment where emotional nuances and resonances bounce against each other, the Doctor's farewell overlapping onto Hartnell's. But again, a spectre looms, his memory failing as he addresses director Richard Martin as Waris from the studio floor.

Equally, when Lambert announces she too is moving on it's a body blow to the actor. Her leaving party and the scene played by Bradley and Raine alone in the TARDIS console room is a bittersweet moment. Lambert thanks Hartnell but he is distraught at the changes being made, unaware yet how Doctor Who thrives and renews itself through such change. She asks if he intends to rest as she is fully aware, unbeknownst to him, of his illness.

In an echo of the line 'this old body of mine is wearing a bit thin' in The Tenth Planet, he simply and proudly claims, 'this old body of mine is good for a few years yet.' The present and the imminent future are about to merge. It ends so tenderly, though, with Hartnell dabbing the wine away from the corners of Lambert's mouth and sharing a farewell kiss.

From this point forward, as press calls announce the arrival of Maureen O'Brien, of Peter Purves and Jackie Lane and, finally, of Anneke Wills and Michael Craze, Hartnell retreats into himself and becomes more and more frustrated as exhaustion wears him down and his memory fails him. One such moment on the set of The Web Planet is deeply moving when, after being haunted by Dalek voices claiming 'he is becoming delirious. I do not understand his words', his words completely fail him.

He becomes a proud man, unable to let go or slow down. 'Mr Hartnell to you, sonny,' he snaps at a director from the gallery, his proprietorial stance about 'my show' emerging as an acerbic corrective to crew members who should know better about how he operates the TARDIS controls. The director's question about the TARDIS time rotor of 'anybody know how to make it go?' could again be seen as a parallel to Hartnell's own failing abilities. Without Lambert or Hussein and other cast members and directors, no one really understands him or how to work with him. A reworking of a speech from The Massacre is used to eloquently distill this feeling: 'Now they've all gone. All gone. None of them ever understood.' Shaking his head, muttering, 'I can't... I can't', he walks off the set. Bradley's performance is incredible.

At the sound of the TARDIS engines, we come full circle and return to 1966. Hartnell approaches Newman with the intention of perhaps slowing down and taking a holiday but is told the astonishing news he is to be replaced. 'No one is irreplaceable' he claimed earlier and that truth has sadly come home to roost. Perhaps he should listen more carefully to granddaughter Judith who believes the TARDIS will 'go on forever and forever because it's special and magic'. She is not far off the mark.

Difficult to work with and suffering from exhaustion and illness, Hartnell's departure ought to have signalled the demise of the show but, as we all know, Newman and company hit upon the remarkable idea of recasting the part and thus renewing and 'regenerating'Doctor Who. We return to Barnes Common and the impending recording of The Tenth Planet, as Hartnell quotes King Lear, 'Fortune, good night, smile once more, turn thy wheel', and where change, not a moment too soon, is in the air.

If the story hasn't been sad enough, then Bradley's performance as Hartnell, upon his return home, really is heartfelt. Sharing the news with his wife Heather, Hartnell breaks down and, in another moment of the past mirroring the future, quotes the final words of the departing Tenth Doctor: 'I don't want to go.' Two actors meet across several generations; a fictional character called the Doctor meets an actor playing an actor who was the first Doctor. Both actors are/were perhaps reluctant to relinquish a part which has made them a household name. An elegiac cry across the decades.

If there's a minor negative aspect to the final scenes during the recording of The Tenth Planet then I'm afraid it rests with Reece Shearsmith's appearance as Patrick Troughton. On paper this sounded perfectly reasonable but in reality it doesn't quite work. Shearsmith doesn't quite get Troughton right. It feels like he's actually attempting to play the Second Doctor rather than Troughton the man and that distinction is crucial to believing this encounter between the two actors. He's also lumbered with a slightly unconvincing wig which, in a production as meticulous as this, is strange. In a drama that hits all the emotional beats perfectly, the scene feels a little flimsy and, unintentionally, something of an afterthought.

The film ends with the past looking into the future as Hartnell is shown gazing across the decades where the future yet to come, our present, is realised in the form of Matt Smith standing opposite him at the controls of the TARDIS. Fittingly, it evokes the series' continuation into the future and Hartnell's own faith in the show, a sense of him knowing somehow it would carry on successfully without him. Mind you, it will date the film. Perhaps, as Gatiss has joked, they can green screen in each current incarnation of the Doctor whenever the film is repeated on anniversaries to come.

Overall, An Adventure in Space and Time is a triumph. Beautifully shot and edited, visually a treat for the eyes and it is especially effective in recalibrating Hartnell's contribution to the series. He was the original and without him we wouldn't be here 50 years later watching Doctor Who. Gatiss pitches the script very well, capturing the child-like nostalgia for the past, the sense of the 1960s as a progressive, ever evolving time inextricably tied to our notions of 'the future' and the way a single role bestows immortality onto the actors who play it. Excellent performances from David Bradley and Jessica Raine provide the heart and soul of the story and a shout out must go to composer Edmund Butt whose music captures the excitement and magic of making Doctor Who in the 1960sand the wistful, sad decline of an actor who briefly found renewed life while playing the title character.


DOCTOR WHO: The Day of the Doctor / Review

$
0
0
The Day of the Doctor
BBC One HD / Red Button 3D
23 November 2013, 7.50pm

Television anniversary stories in Doctor Who are strange affairs. They have to strike a balance. On one hand they are expected to cram in fan-pleasing moments to acknowledge the rich history of the series, to be fronted by multiple versions of the Doctor and they demand the presence of iconic monsters; and on the other hand they have to have a decent but straightforward plot, a narrative that will appeal to the widest possible demographic and hook the many family generations who enjoy having Doctor Who in their lives. Previous anniversary stories have tackled this balancing act with varying degrees of success.

The most prominent television specials are those celebrating the 10th and 20th birthdays - The Three Doctors and The Five Doctors. The 30th was an EastEnders less than charitable cross-over called Dimensions in Time, shot in an unimpressive 3D process, and over which we should draw a discreet veil. The 40th was quietly left to the books, audios and animation of the so-called 'Wilderness Years' but all of which were put into the shade somewhat by the September 2003 announcement Doctor Who was coming back onto telly.
'The name you choose, it's like, it's like a promise you make. He's the one who broke the promise.'
So, The Day of the Doctor follows in this tradition and, on the whole, tips the balance favourably in most directions, even upping the ante in the 3D stakes with a spectacular presentation on the Red Button service and on thousands of cinema screens. One of the most mind boggling aspects to The Day of the Doctor is the global impact it has made. It confirms Doctor Who as a truly global brand, a worldwide phenomenon, with the 75-minute special simulcast in 94 countries. That's millions of people all watching Doctor Who, all around the world, at the same time on the same day. Barry Letts and John Nathan-Turner must be looking down, from whichever afterlife they may occupy, with a mixture of pride, jealousy and awe.

Mind you, if anyone wanted to relive the sheer embarrassment of Dimensions in Time BBC3 were on hand to provide a Proustian rush of car crash television of the highest grade with their Doctor Who: The After Party. The lasting image of it is of Steven Moffat with his head in his hands surrounded by 50 years worth of uncomfortable looking former Doctors and companions as all his hard work was instantly undone by Zoe Ball's horrific time-delayed interview with inarticulate members of pop combo One Direction.

I digress. For such an anticipated event, The Day of the Doctor is primarily a rather intimate story about the central character, about the last of the Time Lords. Yes, it has scale, spectacle, shock and awe but when it boils down to it, Moffat's script forges many connections to anniversary stories past and present with a similar focus on the mythical figure of the Doctor.

The Day of the Doctor revisits the mythology of the Doctor and his responsibility for ending the Time War, by destroying both the Time Lords and the Daleks. It explores the themes of his legitimacy and culpability, through the character of the War Doctor, themes which reflect the very essence of the character and are very much in tune with ideas in The Three Doctors and The Five Doctors.

Before I demonstrate what I mean by this we need to go back to the finale of the last series, The Name of the Doctor. Moffat obviously has to answer the big question - just who is this Doctor played by John Hurt, who completely delivers on his casting, revealed to us in the closing moments of the episode? Stepping into his own time stream to rescue Clara, the Doctor comes face to face with an old man, the man with no name or at least one who has given up the name of Doctor.

An illegitimate offspring who has, according to the Eleventh Doctor, forsaken his name. 'The name you choose, it's like, it's like a promise you make. He's the one who broke the promise,' explains the Doctor. Essentially, the old man is the bastard, the black sheep of the family no one really likes to talk about. He's done a terrible thing.

Other incarnations of the Doctor and other Time Lords have at one point or another been shunned or gone off the rails. In The Three Doctors, the Time Lords come under assault from one of their own, stellar engineer Omega left to go mad in the anti-matter attic of a black hole. To save themselves they turn to the Doctor, the embarrassing relative brushed under the carpet and exiled to Earth. It takes the combined forces of three Doctors to put the universe back on track and their success legitimises the Third Doctor. Until then, he was marooned on Earth, unable to completely fulfill his desire to travel the universe again, righting wrongs, never being cruel or cowardly. He is forgiven and properly takes his place within the echelons of the other Doctors.

When we get to The Five Doctors, the Doctor is again dragged into a 'family' feud. This time old mentor Borusa has been seduced by the darkest machinations of the Time Lord legacy, corrupted by the promise of immortality. The Doctor, still very much a renegade tolerated by the Time Lords, comes to the rescue. His reward is to take up his official duties as Lord President of his own people but he has his own legitimacy to look after. Rather than conform, off he goes in the TARDIS again. After all, that's how it all started.

So there's a pattern. The Doctor is in and out of favour, always having to prove himself to his fellow Time Lords by often battling against other members of the family who've got themselves into a pickle. When we get to the The Name of the Doctor and The Day of the Doctor Moffat takes the idea and makes it the central tenet of a long evolving backstory of which we've previously only had glimpses and mentions: the Time War.

The darkest day in Time Lord history, the Time War between Gallifrey and Skaro has ultimately been responsible for the survivor guilt of the Ninth and Tenth incarnations of the Doctor, the last of the Time Lords after he commits genocide. Behind this act lies the mystery of the Doctor with no name, the old man played by John Hurt and, at the heart of The Day of the Doctor, his redemption. This is, in part, the story of legitimising the War Doctor.

The War Doctor, as we know, came into being during the six minute prequel The Night of the Doctor when the dying Eighth Doctor regenerated at the behest of the Sisterhood of Karn who foresaw the unravelling of the universe as the Time War raged. The Doctor was transformed into the warrior they believed could halt the disaster. The implication here and in The Day of the Doctor is that the War Doctor spent many years fighting to halt the atrocities committed by both sides in the War.

Moffat therefore takes up the reigns of the mythology created by his predecessor Russell T Davies and pulls the narrative back from its 'year zero' implications. Even when Davies brought the Time Lords back in The End of Time, he was very careful to put them and the renegade Master back into the time lock from which they'd briefly escaped.

The Doctor was still, at that stage, left scarred by his act of genocide and Davies clearly felt it was legitimate for the character to continue as 'the lonely god' with a massive chip of inner conflict still on his shoulder. However, at that point he handed the show over to Steven Moffat who took the Doctor on a slightly different journey.

The day before The Day of the Doctor (that sounds weird) BBC2 gave us An Adventure in Space and Time, a dramatisation of the creation of Doctor Who in 1963. Uncannily, the central themes in Mark Gatiss's script were concerned with William Hartnell's personal battle to be 'legitimate' as an actor and escape his own troubled background. The drama's effect was to reconfigure Hartnell's place in the pantheon of actors who have played the Doctor, to understand the conflicts in his personal life that were expressed in his attitudes towards the part, his relationships with fellow cast and crew members.

In a strange, unexpected way the two mythologies converge. Or maybe not. Maybe Moffat and Gatiss had a conflab over a sweet sherry. Well... who knows. Who knows, eh. Moffat reaches back into past fictional narrative and frames the Doctor's authenticity within the greater arc of the Time War, and the emergence of his alter ego the War Doctor, to resolve an existential and moral crisis. At the same time, Gatiss lovingly recreates the past within a television production context, makes us rethink our attitudes towards Hartnell's abilities as a performer and resolves the First Doctor's important position in the family line of actors who went on to play the part.

The final scene of David Bradley and Matt Smith in An Adventure in Space and Time is rather like the Tenth and the Eleventh respecting and legitimising the actions of the War Doctor, acknowledging the debt they owe to him in The Day of the Doctor. John Hurt is or becomes the Doctor because they take responsibility for him. The Day of the Doctor's wonderful cameo featuring Tom Baker as 'the curator' also operates in a similar way. The past and the future overlap. One cannot exist without the other. Tom, as elder statesman, is saying to Matt, and similarly the Fourth Doctor is asking the Eleventh Doctor, not to forget those whom have served, whether in the Time War or in Lime Grove D. These scenes don't just serve as a kiss to the past, they - to put it in Moffat-ian terms - positively snog its face off and use tongues.
'Waste no more time about what a good man should be. Be one.' 
Oh... (starts sounding like Tom Baker)... and what kisses, eh. What kisses. The hypnotic swirls of the original title sequence, the programme's title in its original font, the original Derbyshire arrangement of the title music and a policeman on the beat as the shipping forecast drifts in the air. An Unearthly Child bleeds into The Day of the Doctor as the policeman, in monochrone, gains colour and passes by 76 Totter's Lane and the Coal Hill School where today its Chairman of the Governors is one I. Chesterton. He must be a ripe old age.

Ironically, Clara is there teaching her pupils. How she made the leap from nanny to teacher is open to debate but she's already framing the examination of the Doctor's conscience at the heart of the episode by quoting Marcus Aurelius: 'Waste no more time about what a good man should be. Be one.' Off she speeds, at 5.16pm of course, to meet the Doctor in a bravura sequence where she rides her motorbike through the TARDIS doors and into the console room in one continuous shot.

The spectacle, which looks great in 3D, is ramped up even further by a dazzling sequence where the TARDIS is airlifted by U.N.I.T to Trafalgar Square. A global brand needs to emphasise its essential qualities so the spectacular views above London and the familiar London landmarks cleave more to the Russell T Davies school of showmanship than Moffat's but this a title sequence designed to grab your attention.

With images of Derren Brown's home filled with flowers of apology from U.N.I.T after using him as a cover story for such stunts, the episode moves on to the story proper. Sealed orders from Elizabeth I bring the Doctor, Kate Stewart (Jemma Redgrave) and Osgood (Ingrid Oliver), the scarf wearing U.N.I.T scientist, to the National Gallery where a piece of 3D Time Lord art, a painting of the Fall of Arcadia, Gallifrey's second city, and entitled No More or Gallifrey Falls, is on display.

Elizabeth is sending him a message and for the Doctor it is a painful reminder of the last day of the Time War when 'the other me, the one I don't talk about' fought in the war on 'the day he killed them all.' There's slippage between 'he' and 'I' - denial working overtime it seems - as director Nick Hurran uses a close up of Matt Smith's eyes and transposes upon them the lines of age from John Hurt's face, underlining the fact that within the youthful Smith's visage the older man lives on.

This confessional allows Hurran to use the concept of the 3D painting, a slice of frozen time, to great effect. The camera swoops into the painting and the last day of the War bursts into life. It is an exceptional, spectacular sequence as the Daleks bombard the Time Lord city, buildings explode, ships whizz by and citizens attempt to scramble to safety. That primal fear that children have of the Daleks is brought home effectively in a scene where the Daleks round up survivors, including the children clutching their toys. It's a heady mixture of Star Wars and reportage that breathtakingly culminates with the War Doctor slamming the TARDIS into the Daleks and knocking them over like skittles.

The words 'No More', blasted into the wall by the Doctor, serve as a reminder of his fall from status as conscientious objector and now reluctantly getting his hands dirty. It's also the first of many clues in plain sight, a familiar Moffat trait, that echo the sentiments of the drama. A dying Dalek puzzles over their meaning. No more hiding the dark Doctor's legacy and no more anxiety about the fall of Gallifrey and his hand in it, perhaps? 

From here we are whisked into Gallifrey's War Room. When did the Time Lords last take up arms on such a scale as this, when did they last have generals leading them into battle? No wonder the Doctor was a reluctant bystander, no wonder Cass shrank back from being rescued above Karn. The Time Lords have become war mongers to be feared and not respected. If you wanted evidence as to why the Sisterhood of Karn needed a warrior to fight on the side of the universe then look no further. We might talk about the Doctor's authenticity being compromised by the existence of the War Doctor but it seems his peers have undergone something of a similar transformation.

There is some stunning design work on screen here befitting a big screen epic. The Time Lords look splendid in a form of battle gear that merges the Gallifreyan symbols of old with the new graphics created for the series since 2005. The lighting is particularly effective with searchlights sweeping over figures caught in silhouette and dappling faces in the half dark.

We discover that the Moment, a super-weapon so powerful it developed sentience, has been taken by the Doctor. It is this weapon, this Moment in the hands of the Doctor, which finishes the Time War. As if to confirm his previous messages and intentions, the War Doctor serves notice on the Daleks and Time Lords: 'Too long have I stayed my hand. No more.' As the Doctor searches for a way to operate what looks like a super-sized version of Hellraiser's Lament Configuration, he is visited by the machine's interface and conscience.

Rose Tyler, or the Bad Wolf version of her, is plucked from the Doctor's future memories as a ghost of Christmas to come to show the Doctor, or the man who claims to have lost the right to be the Doctor, the consequences of his action in a war where all of space and time is burning. She wants to show him the man he will become, the last of the Time Lords, in order to inform his decision to use the Moment and complete the mutually assured destruction of Gallifrey and the Daleks.

Billie Piper is quite different here, reprising her attitude as the Bad Wolf in command of the vortex seen at the end of The Parting of the Ways. Here she is again, a sentient weapon determining the Doctor's destiny. It's a strange, precise performance and quietly disturbing to see a Rose Tyler so unlike the Rose Tyler we all knew. She informs the War Doctor his punishment is to become the last survivor of the war. As the future Doctors know the first rule of survivor's guilt is you don't talk about survivor's guilt. You try and bury it. The Moment is trying to uncover what happens when you find meaning and make sense out of these experiences.

Much of this ties into Moffat's perennial themes about memory, remembrance and forgetting, Not only does he imbue his creatures with powers to erase memory and change perception but he also taps into the power of memory with the Doctor and his companions. In The Day of the Doctor this is writ large in the Moment's determination to get the future Doctors to remember their forgotten incarnation via 'a tangle in time through the days to come', to remember the millions of children killed on Gallifrey. The Moment offers a way for Moffat to intertwine the lives and actions of the Doctors and to remember the forgotten.

So far so good.

Queen Elizabeth I has brought the Doctor to the National Gallery and the crucial painting. Her message to the future has been handed over to the Doctor by U.N.I.T and the painting of Gallifrey, a slice of time frozen in Time Lord art by an unknown artist, is evidence of her true credentials. In a bizarre subplot we discover that the Time Lord art is being used by Zygons in the past to bide their time, hide inside the works of art, and emerge to invade the future.

The mood shifts from sombre reflection to something of a romp as the Tenth Doctor's hijinks with Queen Elizabeth (Joanna Page) in 1562, which pick up some continuity references from The Shakespeare Code and The End of Time, not only show him marrying her through a case of mistaken identity but also reveal the Zygons' plan. The return of the Zygons is handled particularly well and the make up and costume designs are more or less unchanged from their 1975 appearance. Hissing and roaring into view, they look very impressive and imposing. However, their presence is merely a sub-plot to get us to a position where their knack for hiding inside Time Lord paintings offers a potential way of saving Gallifrey as the Daleks bombard the planet.
'Am I having a mid-life crisis?'
The Zygon plan is to invade the planet by breaking into U.N.I.T's Black Vault of alien technology by impersonating Kate Stewart and Osgood. It provides a parallel narrative to the Doctor's own dilemma. Kate Stewart finds herself face to face with her Zygon counterpart with no choice but to blow the Vault up with a nuclear warhead and kill millions to save billions. The Doctor complicates matters by using the Black Vault's security system, which wipes the memories of people who work there (Moffat re-employing his tropes again), to confuse the Zygon and human identities in the room.

No one knows whether they are Zygon or human. The two parties are therefore left to negotiate from this standpoint, unable to justify their use of the nuclear weapon for fear of wiping out the wrong side. This is what philosopher John Rawls calls the 'original position' - in which a group must decide how to negotiate together fairly and equally without prejudice and also deprived of knowledge which would unbalance the situation - and the so called 'veil of ignorance' theory which Charlie Jane Anders also explores in her review on io9.

The sub-plot is certainly a mirror of the War Doctor's own activities on Gallifrey. Both feature a Vault full of deadly weapons, both involve making a decision about the future of millions of lives. The Moment is the War Doctor's conscience, encouraging him to meet his other selves and for each to understand the gravity of what he does. Clara is the equivalent, looking upon her Doctor with fresh eyes, particularly when all three Doctors decide to share the responsibility of their actions in destroying the Time Lords and the Daleks. If, as the Moment suggests, the War Doctor is reborn then who is he reborn as? How does he deal with the consequences of this holocaust in all his future choices, his future lives? And as Clara suggests, which rules apply when regeneration could lead you to forget the traumas of the past?

Hence we get that very interesting scene between the three Doctors where generational differences define their attitudes towards the Time War. It's a very interesting view of how we all cope with traumatic, world changing events, everything from the assassination of JFK to the terrorism of 9/11. The War Doctor discovers that his future selves are 'the man who regrets' and 'the man who forgets'. Generations - or regenerations - need to be reminded of these terrible events. After all, it's part of being grown up.

The repartee between Tennant, Smith and Hurt crackles vividly and the generational differences are played for comedy as well as for drama. Hurt's Doctor is distressed ('Am I having a mid-life crisis?') to find his future selves talking and behaving like children. Moffat takes his cue from The Three Doctors here, with Hurt more or less the sterner Hartnell figure quite appalled at 'Sand shoes' and 'Chinny' and we even get a re-run of the redecorating the TARDIS interior gag ('Oh, you've redecorated.''I don't like it.'). Like their sonic screwdrivers and their own bodies, the various TARDIS interiors appear on screen as a phasing, single interface and Hurt's TARDIS is wonderfully old school and comes complete with 'the round things'.

The Zygons, while excellent in the scenes they appear, are merely a means to end for Moffat. Their attempt to conquer the Earth is simply a mechanism to find the solution to the War Doctor's problem, namely the use of the Gallifreyan art to store the war torn planet and its population in a slice of time.

Leaving the Daleks to shoot themselves to pieces as Gallifrey disappears still maintains a certain truth, that they annihilated each other in the War after all, but this is another example of how Moffat is willing to take great chunks of lore (over which there is no ownership, let's be clear) and simply rewrite it for his own purposes.

Thus, Russell T Davies' modus operandi for the Doctor, established in 2005, now allows for the potentially lost Time Lords to survive. A reboot along the same lines as Clara jumping back into the many lives of the Doctor to save him, the resetting of time in The Wedding of River Song and travelling back down your own timeline to bring the universe back in The Big Bang. All told in Moffat's customary non-linear, multiple points of view and hanging narrative modes where paradox and predestination dominate the story.

The War Doctor is transformed, authenticated, legitimised as a 'proper' Doctor because he was 'the Doctor more than anybody else' when he took the brave decision to burn Gallifrey and the Daleks. He takes his place in the line up, the warrior to the Tenth's hero, and in direct line to the Eleventh Doctor who has discovered what he has forgotten. He's always made things better, he's always been a doctor. The title is a promise, a promise that writer Terrance Dicks originally made, that the Doctor is 'never cruel or cowardly'.

Moffat's coup de théâtre for the 50th Anniversary is, of course, the bringing together of 13 Doctors to power the transfer of Gallifrey into the parallel pocket universe. The Time Lords and their TARDISes collectively work together and we get a brief, but thrilling, glimpse of Peter Capaldi who, in a single glare to camera, seems to signify the very hope the Time Lords and viewers of the series are looking for. His imminent arrival, as an actor the same age when Hartnell took the role, may well have triggered Moffat's reflections about maturity and authenticity in the conversations between the other Doctors. 

To cap it all we also get a remarkable scene with Matt Smith and Tom Baker. The passing of the baton in many ways, heartfelt and emotional, as the retired curator of the Under Gallery, a man with a very familiar face, pauses to reflect on the future. He catches the spirit of the Anniversary by suggesting to the Doctor he may care to recall some other faces and 'in years to come, you might find yourself revisiting a few but just... the old favourites, eh?'

The fourth wall and the Fourth Doctor melt away as the distinctions between Tom and the character vanish. He stands in a gallery that looks like the interior of a TARDIS. It's what we've all known all along. Tom and the Time Lord are interchangeable. Images and words shift and the painting, we discover, is actually called Gallifrey Falls No More. The Eleventh Doctor is given his quest. To find the lost Gallifrey. 'I can only tell you what I would do, if I were you... Oh! If I were you... perhaps I was you, of course. Or perhaps you are me,' muses the Fourth Doctor.

Who knows. But the Doctor's going home.

DOCTOR WHO: The Time of the Doctor / Review

$
0
0
The Time of the Doctor
BBC One HD
25 December 2013, 7.30pm

Your stomach's fit to burst and only until you force down yet another luxury chocolate or another branded bit of confectionary from a selection box do you realise that perhaps you've overindulged at Christmas. Yet, you keep going back for more. You pile into turkey, Christmas pudding, mince pies as if you've never seen such a feast before. But you've seen it and eaten it all before. You do it every year.

Sorry, I was digressing. Just thinking about my Christmas dinner again. Oddly enough, the after effects - flatulence and indigestion - did not abate watching The Time of the Doctor. For an end of era story, featuring a regeneration to boot, it felt as if Steven Moffat was devouring a running buffet of the last three seasons under his auspices. Another bowl of fish custard, anyone? One more slice of turkey?
Moffat's trilogy, beginning with The Name of the Doctor, continuing in The Day of the Doctor and concluding here, is firmly centred on the impending change from Matt Smith to Peter Capaldi but it is also an attempt to deal with 'the final problem'. What happens when the Doctor reaches his final incarnation and how does the show get past the 'rule' of thirteen Doctors as set down by Robert Holmes in 1976's The Deadly Assassin? In the anniversary year Moffat is clearly on a mission to deal with this shibboleth and, as is customary, break every rule in the book.
'I can change 12 times. 13 versions of me'
The Time of the Doctor's entire running time therefore reduces down, a bit like a red wine sauce, to one very crucial exchange between Clara and the aged Eleventh Doctor. It's just after half way through the episode when Clara assures the Doctor he can change again. 'No, not for ever. I can change 12 times. 13 versions of me,' explains the Doctor. Clara, as our representative canon keeper, tells him he's number 11. Moffat, having already wedged in John Hurt's Doctor between McGann and Eccleston, triumphantly waggles his finger and reminds us that back in Journey's End: 'Number 10 once regenerated and kept the same face.'

So there you have the problem. Now for the solution. Clearly there are a number of plot points to deal with from The Day of the Doctorregarding the Time Lords. Were they saved in another universe as was postulated? Will the Doctor find them and restore them to our universe? Moffat essentially deals with the regeneration question and the Time Lords rather adeptly but the resolution on its own could never fill an hour's television.

Like many of Moffat's grander episodes, especially his season finales, we get a modicum of plot floating in a sea of random ideas (wooden Cybermen, anyone?), highly crafted and exceptional visuals, and what feels like a race against the running time to answer all of the nagging questions he's littered the series with since 2010.

The episode opens with a typical Moffat trope. The fairy tale introduction of 'once upon a time...' If anything can be said about the Matt Smith era then the use of fairy or folk tale and mythology (not just the classic variety but also the show's own in-built history) is vital to the construction and definition of the Doctor during Moffat's tenure.

Series 5 was wholly focused on the 'crack in the universe' arc and how the restitution of the shattering universe was tied into the maturing of the companion, Amy Pond and the Peter Pan/Wendy relationship between her and the Doctor; Series 6 was busy exploring the origins of River Song and her marriage, the fairy tale mystique of 'the perfect husband', her initial role in the Silence's campaign to destroy the Doctor and his own demystification; Series 7 was focused on the name of the Doctor and the power of the Time Lord's mythology.

All these specific story arcs can very neatly fit into the definition and purpose of folk tale as determined by Vladimir Propp, for example. His examination of the Russian folk tale as a series of functions works very well in context with Doctor Who, outlining the role of the hero and villain and specific motifs. For Moffat, The Time of the Doctor is an opportunity to return to many of his own motifs and replay them to examine the psychology of the Doctor, his relationship with a specific community (Time Lords, the inhabitants of Christmas town and, briefly, Clara's family) and the cosmology of the universe (the religious zeal of his enemies and their desire to wipe him and the Time Lords out, the causation of the crack in the universe, the actual passage of time).

Tasha Lem announces that 'once there was a planet' which sent out a message to the universe. Messages, hidden or in plain sight, are another Moffat trope. They've been in his episodes since Blink's warning behind the wallpaper. Characters are always offering the Doctor a cryptic warning, an interdiction to seek out some useful piece of knowledge, and here it's 'a bell tolling among the stars' returning us to the vexed question of 'Doctor Who?', something which seems to have perplexed Moffat for some time.

The problem is I don't really care about that question. I've never asked the question because I already know the answer, as do many millions of fans I suspect. Moffat is worried we are still asking that question some 50 years after the series started. The 'Doctor Who?' gag worked well in An Unearthly Child but we got the joke long ago and I think you can stop embarrassing yourself Steven.

Fair enough that it's partly understandable in the context of an exploration of the Doctor's mythology but the fact that no one still knows his real name is an itch Moffat obsessively scratches at. The expression of the Doctor's mythology in The Day of the Doctor, where Moffat delivered a satisfying re-statement of the iconic nature of the title hero, is somewhat deflated by returning to the leftover plot elements of The Wedding of River Song and The Name of the Doctor.

There is a feeling of inevitability to The Time of the Doctor. The return to Trenzalore to hear the oldest question in the universe answered is as welcome as the undercooked turkey sitting in the innards of the TARDIS. That the name is a password to facilitate the return of the Time Lords brings it all to the attention of his enemies. Just as in The Big Bang, their ships mass above the Doctor's head. It's a way for Moffat to throw in the monsters and explosions as he tries to bring closure to many of his hanging narratives.

One of the nonsensical moments in the episode is right there in the pre-titles sequence. Why does the Doctor randomly teleport onto a Dalek ship carrying a bit of a Dalek? Why does he rely on Handles to do this for him? Is he unable to identify Dalek ships these days without the aid of a disembodied Cyberman head?

There are sophisticated scanners on the TARDIS which he clearly uses to identify the ships after he's risked life and limb to visit them. Where's the sense in that? The only joy in that scene is to see lots of Daleks ranting at the Doctor. And how many times have we seen that? As if to ram home the point Moffat repeats it again by sending the Doctor and Handles to a ship full of Cybermen. The duplication of a scene within minutes must be a bit of record and it feels distinctly like padding.

It's structurally a very elaborate set up for Handles the Cyberman where the whole business of patching the telephone back to the console is a bit of joke about the role of the companion and their facility to act as the audience's representative, constantly and repetitively asking for the answer to the bleeding obvious.

Paying off later in the episode, it's an uncomplicated relationship and the question of a companion's loyalty, friendship and emotional baggage - the 'feels' as the modern kids are keen to describe them - is thrown into sharp relief by a lump of metal with two jug ears. Remember when Tom Baker thought a talking cabbage would make a good companion...

In stark contrast we get Clara ringing the Doctor up and pleading with him to be her 'boyfriend' because she's having a shit Christmas Day with her relatives and the cooking of a turkey seems to be beyond an intelligent woman who is supposed to be a teacher? Mind you, she was terrible at making soufflés. Ironically, Clara jokes about the turkey being 'dead and decapitated' as usual for Christmas. Is Handles the talking turkey, then? Or is the episode considered ready for stuffing?

We're back again into the 'imaginary friend' trope. The Raggedy Man does seem to attract obsessive types. If it isn't Amelia Pond going doolally after meeting the Doctor as a child then it's Clara demanding his presence at table because she's so insecure she can't be an independent single woman without inventing a boyfriend. She's really rather pathetic begging him on the phone to 'come to Christmas dinner and be my Christmas date'. As a character she's still lacking in consistency.

Clara's family seems to have undergone a change. Her dad seems to have aged terribly since we last saw him (a result of re-casting it seems) in The Rings of Akhaten and he's saddled with a snooty, scornful girlfriend, Linda. When the TARDIS lands at the Powell Estate (yes, your eyes are not deceiving you - it's the same location as used in Rose) you half expect Jackie and Rose to invite the Doctor in.
'dead and decapitated'  
He certainly had a better time of it round theirs in The Christmas Invasion after all and he didn't have to show up stark bollock naked or slap his companion on her arse to get some attention. Just more bewildering attempts at comedy in an attempt to work in another of those ideas - hologram clothes - that have nothing of relevance to the story but Moffat seems to think we'll enjoy. So you go to church wearing hologram clothes and spend the entire episode naked? Really? Because 'we're all naked underneath'? A clumsy old metaphor if ever there was one.

And the really good metaphor is about the turkey. Clara is so inept at cooking and having boyfriends that she has to use the TARDIS to vortex cook the poor dead bird. 'It'll either come up a treat, or possibly lay some eggs,' warns the Doctor. The latter in the case of The Time of the Doctor.

The use of the family really does echo back to the RTD era and the best it can achieve here is with the character of Gran, a lovely little turn by Sheila Reid, who seems to be the only one to emotionally connect with the ridiculous presence of the Doctor and, later, with a depressed Clara who has been returned to Earth by the Doctor to keep her safe. Gran's age and wisdom runs in parallel with the aged Doctor sitting and philosophising in the church on war torn Trenzalore.

It's only until we've got the boyfriend meeting the family at Christmas and turkey out of the way that we finally get back to the rudiments of the plot and the elements left unresolved from the last three seasons.

Of course nothing is straight-forward in Moffat's world. At first we're told that the planet around which the Doctor's enemies mass and from the where the message originates is Gallifrey but as the Doctor points out to the talking cabbage... sorry Handles... he knows Gallifrey when he sees it and that isn't it. Which is handy when the Papal Mainframe pops up and the Mother Superious, Tasha Lem, invites them to her security church. A step up, but not much, from a security kitchen then. A religious order that controls the universe and is 'keeping you safe in this world and the next' could do with a security chapel and a security choir stall. 

And it's here that we get to the more interesting aspects of a flabby story. Beyond the smoke and mirrors of daft ideas, one of the central themes here is about religions and factions seeking control over a war. Moffat places this in contrast to the awkward family Christmas, the ritual we are left with at this time of year where people who don't really like each other force themselves to glut in celebration of a Christian calendar's appropriation of the pagan winter solstice.

He reflects on the season's Christian themes of rebirth and the Doctor's regeneration and the idea that Christmas town, an idealised snow covered place of contentment where innocent inhabitants can only be truthful, is some sort of symbol for the West Bank and Bethlehem's position in the Palestinian and Israeli battle for control of the region.

The Daleks, the Cybermen, the Silence and the Weeping Angels provide a visual analogy to the town's long history of being caught in decades of political, social and religious conflicts and the Doctor's slow path defence of Christmas town is a reminder of the tense sieges and the armed stand offs in Bethlehem. The security church maintains a truce over the planet and, acting as a peace keeping force, allows the Doctor down as some sort of special envoy. As the Doctor so eloquently sums up the plot 15 minutes in, 'sweet little town covered in snow, half the universe in terror', just as certain angels interrupt the proceedings.

We're back again to the idea of the the religious order setting out to destroy the Doctor as seen in A Good Man Goes To War. And then we have the femme fatale figure of Tasha Lem. A sultry figure before whom you must appear naked and who is just as fixated on the Doctor's history as River Song. Moffat's idea of strong women is, as always, questionable. He likes them powerful ('boss of the psycho space nuns') and - yes, for the final time - feisty but very needy. We've been here and done this many times before with River, with Irene Adler and other 'mother' figures. This time there's no mucking about and the shenanigans between the Doctor and 'Tash', frothing and flirting over a bed that looks like an altar, is all heavy handed and adolescent in its conflation of repression, sex and religion.

Still, let's give Moffat his due. He actually confesses rather smugly he's not very good at writing female characters by cracking a few jokes about it. Under the influence of the planet's truth field, even Clara confesses she's 'a bubbly personality masking bossy control freak' and, let's give a round of applause to the trope of all tropes, that she ran off with an alien because she fancied him. Oh, Lord.

Oh, and the idea that the Doctor can hide a TARDIS key in his wig is just more sleight of hand to get the TARDIS down to Christmas town and a bit of silliness, elbowing the audience in the ribs and saying, 'we know you know Matt had his hair cut for a film and we've had to give him a wig.' Oh, my sides.

Fortunately, now properly clothed and having landed on the planet, the Doctor and Clara can get back to the story and start dealing with all sorts of continuity references. The biggest is of course the crack in the wall the Doctor discovers in the church. Not only was the crack a major story arc in Series 5 but it was also the thing the Doctor most feared when he popped into room 11 of the hotel in The God Complex. Some quick flashbacks remind those of us who may have forgotten.

It's taken 20 minutes of frankly a lot of arsing about to actually get to the point where the Doctor realises that Handles has decoded a message from Gallifrey as it tries to re-enter our universe through the weakest point of the crack in reality. Cue frantic exchange of dialogue and the real consequence of the truth field designated by the Time Lords as a sort of galactic lie detector.

And yet another sleight of hand. The Doctor suddenly produces the seal of the High Council, which presumably has been gathering dust in his pocket since The Five Doctors in 1983, to decode the Time Lord's message. We could have avoided 20 minutes of arsing about if he'd just bothered to heed Handles telling him the message was from Gallifrey and fumbled in his pocket there and then. Handles, the bodiless prophet, decodes the message and reminds us of the other bodiless seer of Maldovar and Dorium's conversation with the Doctor in The Wedding of River Song.

He informed him of his impending death on Trenzalore and about 'The First Question, the oldest question in the Universe, that must never be answered, hidden in plain sight.' Time's up and the First Question needs to be answered truthfully but to do so would bring the Time Lords back to face the mass of enemies in orbit above the planet. The Time War would recommence. In order to prevent that the Doctor is forced to remain as a guardian over the planet, growing old and infirm as he protects the inhabitants of Christmas town against the various attacks from above.
'Raggedy man... Goodnight.' 
Silence falls because the Doctor must not speak his name. Trenzalore will burn if he does. In essesnce this again reaches back into fairy and folk tales and the power of names and naming. There are of course the well known magic words, the saying of something will make it happen, such as shazam or abracadabra. The Doctor's name is a word of power, a symbol of the uncanny in Moffat's world driven by the hidden and the unknowable.

The unnamed Time Lord God must remain abstract. If he is revealed as a sham, like the Wizard of Oz, then he is simply an ordinary man sitting in the middle of all the episode's pyrotechnics. The truth field ensures that those guessing the name of the Doctor will never acquire power over him. The Doctor should be an unknowable power, personified as 'Doctor Who?' Like Rumplestiltskin, if the Doctor is named his power is taken away from him.

The episode once again turns to Tasha Lem's voice over narrative and a montage of scenes to depict the consequences of the Doctor's attempts to protect the town and the Time Lords. The distancing effect of these voice over narratives, particularly when they are performed by a character we do not yet know, is something fellow reviewer Stuart Ian Burns astutely focuses on in his review here. This montage comes complete with comedy invisible Sontarans and children's games (another Moffat trope) with wooden Cybermen  equipped with flame throwers. How wooden Cybermen would actually work is debatable but they underline a fairy tale approach to the final, stronger half of the episode.

Here we learn that it was the Kovarian chapter of the Papal Mainframe who blew up the TARDIS and sent River Song to assassinate him and these revelations thus tidy up, without much fanfare considering their importance, the threads of continuity that have been hanging around since 2010. But that's by the by. The last 25 minutes are dominated by Matt Smith and his quietly powerful performance as an aged Doctor, a wizened sheriff facing off the terrors invading the town. As many have pointed out, the youngest actor to get the role is transformed into a little old man just as he relinquishes it to the oldest actor chosen as his replacement.

He's at the height of his powers and rescues an episode that doesn't quite find its feet until he comes hobbling out of the church and tricks a Cyberman into blowing itself up. There are lots of tiny little echoes - the Monoids in the puppet show, a mention of arm wrestling a Draconian, the drunk giraffe, the children drawing countless pictures of their hero - which reinforce the notion of the Doctor as a myth, a legend, a powerful story of 'the man who stayed for Christmas' and gave his life to keep Christmas safe in all meanings of the word. Well, we'd all wait for him, guarding his TARDIS.

And of course the name of the Doctor is hidden in plain sight. Clara, having returned from the safety of Earth after the Doctor packed her off in the TARDIS (just like he did with Rose in The Parting of the Ways), reminds the Time Lords that his name has always been 'The Doctor' when the Daleks take over the Papal Mainframe and invade the planet. Sadly, we say goodbye to Handles, a companion who stuck with the Doctor for 300 years, who never once had to dress up as a policewoman or cook a turkey but who could remember to remind the Doctor to patch the telephone into the console. Faithful unto death. 

Moffat even makes sure that the Daleks know who the Doctor is (their knowledge of him was wiped from their databanks by Clara in Asylum of the Daleks) after they harvest Tasha Lem's body and he falls into their trap aboard the Papal Mainframe. Sadly, we're back into 'Doctor insults a woman for being weak but really gets her angry' territory so he can snog her and she can destroy his enemies. The strong woman who really desires to be bowled over by a wiser father figure motif is crude at best and it's a trope that Moffat tiresomely drags out again and again. In this universe, it's either get 'feisty' women hot under the collar or ask them to undertake some self sacrifice to prove themselves.

In the end, the regeneration is a curious beast. A little whisper of golden magic dust from the crack in the wall and the Doctor gets a new life cycle (something we knew the Time Lords could grant anyway so no surprises there) and yet he proceeds to blow everything to smithereens once he's got that power.

There are a lot of contradictions in this. Generative power becomes destructive, the life affirming Doctor who fretted over the inhabitants of Christmas town lays waste to all and sundry. Peace on Earth and goodwill to all men... eh? I'm not entirely sure a regenerating Time Lord going off like a nuclear bomb is quite what Christmas town or we deserved. The image is all the more startling linked as it is to a Doctor who has spent the last 50 minutes protecting a planet from a war specifically in his name.

The intimate scenes between Clara and the ancient Doctor are to be cherished amongst the exhausted remains of the Matt Smith era, in the detritus of a particularly gaudy, cheap Christmas cracker. They are sensitively played and beautifully sum up the departure of the Eleventh Doctor.

'Eleven's hour is over now. the clock is striking twelve's' reads Clara from said cracker and change is upon us. But not before Clara has some stern words for Time Lords and reaffirms what we've all known for so long: 'It's time someone told you you've been getting it wrong. His name. His name is the Doctor. All the name he needs. Everything you need to know about him.'

'Like breath on a mirror' the Eleventh disappears from view, ruminating about how we all change through out our lives and remembering both the little Amelia that first saw him and the adult Amy that she became. 'Raggedy man... Goodnight.' It's a sweet conclusion to the reign of the Eleventh Doctor and one of the few powerfully emotional scenes in a terribly mechanical and functional affair. It's a gorgeous bauble to look at but it lacks the epic power and emotional force of nostalgia in The Day of the Doctor.

And that's that. Well, apart from Peter Capaldi grumbling about his kidneys and crashing the TARDIS. I'm not so worried about Capaldi learning 'how to fly this thing'. He'll be fine. I'm more concerned that Moffat, based on this scattershot, rambling, indulgent effort, renews his own driving licence in 2014.

Viewing all 117 articles
Browse latest View live